Suppr超能文献

识别普通人群中的晚睡型和早睡型睡眠相位障碍:一项针对新西兰成年人的全国性调查。

Identifying advanced and delayed sleep phase disorders in the general population: a national survey of New Zealand adults.

作者信息

Paine Sarah-Jane, Fink Jo, Gander Philippa H, Warman Guy R

机构信息

Sleep/Wake Research Centre, School of Public Health, Massey University , Wellington , New Zealand and.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2014 Jun;31(5):627-36. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.885036. Epub 2014 Feb 18.

Abstract

The aim was to estimate the prevalence of, and identify independent risk factors for, Advanced (ASPD) and Delayed Sleep Phase Disorder (DSPD) among Māori (indigenous New Zealanders) and non-Māori adults using a self-report questionnaire. The Munich Chronotype Questionnaire was mailed to a stratified sample of 9100 adults (5100 Māori and 4000 non-Māori) aged 20-59 years randomly selected from the electoral rolls (54% response rate). Different definitions for ASPD and DSPD were developed using combinations of symptoms including self-reported bed and rising times, current chronotype, and a desire to change sleep schedule. Logistic regression models were used to model the likelihood of reporting ASPD or DSPD separately after adjusting for ethnicity (Māori versus non-Māori), sex (males versus females), age (in decades), socio-economic deprivation (NZDep2006 deciles) and employment status (unemployed, night work versus employed with no night work). The prevalence of ASPD ranged from 0.25% to 7.13% whereas the prevalence of DSPD was 1.51 to 8.90% depending on the definition used. The prevalence of ASPD was higher among men and increased with age. The prevalence of DSPD was higher among those living in more deprived areas and decreased with age. After controlling for ethnicity, gender, age, socio-economic deprivation and employment status, people with ASPD were more likely to report excessive daytime sleepiness, whereas those with DSPD were more likely to report poor or fair self-rated health. Reporting ASPD and DSPD were associated with self-reported night work. In this large sleep timing survey, we found no differences in the prevalence of self-identified ASPD and DSPD between Maori and non-Maori. This has implications for the development and provision of sleep health services and strategies for managing the significant impact of work patterns on sleep.

摘要

目的是通过一份自填式问卷,估计毛利人(新西兰原住民)和非毛利成年人中晚期睡眠相位延迟障碍(ASPD)和延迟睡眠相位障碍(DSPD)的患病率,并确定其独立危险因素。《慕尼黑时间类型问卷》被邮寄给从选民名单中随机抽取的9100名年龄在20至59岁之间的成年人(5100名毛利人和4000名非毛利人)组成的分层样本(回复率为54%)。ASPD和DSPD的不同定义是通过结合包括自我报告的上床和起床时间、当前时间类型以及改变睡眠时间表的愿望等症状制定的。在调整了种族(毛利人与非毛利人)、性别(男性与女性)、年龄(以十年计)、社会经济剥夺程度(2006年新西兰剥夺指数十分位数)和就业状况(失业、夜班工作与无夜班工作的就业情况)之后,使用逻辑回归模型分别对报告ASPD或DSPD的可能性进行建模。根据所使用的定义,ASPD的患病率在0.25%至7.13%之间,而DSPD的患病率为1.51%至8.90%。ASPD的患病率在男性中较高,且随年龄增长而增加。DSPD的患病率在生活在更贫困地区的人群中较高,且随年龄增长而降低。在控制了种族、性别、年龄、社会经济剥夺程度和就业状况之后,患有ASPD的人更有可能报告白天过度嗜睡,而患有DSPD的人更有可能报告自我健康评分较差或一般。报告ASPD和DSPD与自我报告的夜班工作有关。在这项大型睡眠时间调查中,我们发现毛利人和非毛利人自我认定的ASPD和DSPD患病率没有差异。这对睡眠健康服务的开发和提供以及管理工作模式对睡眠的重大影响的策略具有启示意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验