• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过项目协作提高产科安全性。

Improved obstetric safety through programmatic collaboration.

作者信息

Goffman Dena, Brodman Michael, Friedman Arnold J, Minkoff Howard, Merkatz Irwin R

机构信息

Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.

出版信息

J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014;33(3):14-22. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21131.

DOI:10.1002/jhrm.21131
PMID:24549697
Abstract

Healthcare safety and quality are critically important issues in obstetrics, and society, healthcare providers, patients and insurers share a common goal of working toward safer practice, and are continuously seeking strategies to facilitate improvements. To this end, 4 New York City voluntary hospitals with large maternity services initiated a unique collaborative quality improvement program. It was facilitated by their common risk management advisors, FOJP Service Corporation, and their professional liability insurer, Hospitals Insurance Company. Under the guidance of 4 obstetrics and gynecology departmental chairmen, consensus best practices for obstetrics were developed which included: implementation of evidence based protocols with audit and feedback; standardized educational interventions; mandatory electronic fetal monitoring training; and enhanced in-house physician coverage. Each institution developed unique safety related expertise (development of electronic documentation, team training, and simulation education), and experiences were shared across the collaborative. The collaborative group developed robust systems for audit of outcomes and documentation quality, as well as enforcement mechanisms. Ongoing feedback to providers served as a key component of the intervention. The liability carrier provided financial support for these patient safety innovations. As a result of the interventions, the overall AOI for our institutions decreased 42% from baseline (January-June 2008) to the most recently reviewed time period (July-December 2011) (10.7% vs 6.2%, p < 0.001). The Weighted Adverse Outcome Score (WAOS) also decreased during the same time period (3.9 vs 2.3, p = 0.001.) Given the improved outcomes noted, our unique program and the process by which it was developed are described in the hopes that others will recognize collaborative partnering with or without insurers as an opportunity to improve obstetric patient safety.

摘要

医疗保健安全与质量是产科领域至关重要的问题,社会、医疗保健提供者、患者和保险公司都有一个共同目标,即致力于更安全的医疗实践,并不断寻求促进改善的策略。为此,纽约市4家拥有大型产科服务的志愿医院发起了一项独特的合作质量改进计划。该计划由它们共同的风险管理顾问FOJP服务公司及其专业责任保险公司医院保险公司提供协助。在4位妇产科系主任的指导下,制定了产科的共识最佳实践,包括:实施基于证据的方案并进行审核与反馈;标准化教育干预;强制性电子胎儿监护培训;以及加强内部医生覆盖。每个机构都发展了独特的安全相关专业知识(电子文档开发、团队培训和模拟教育),并在合作中分享经验。合作小组开发了强大的结果审核和文档质量系统以及执行机制。持续向提供者提供反馈是干预措施的关键组成部分。责任保险公司为这些患者安全创新提供了资金支持。由于采取了这些干预措施,我们机构的总体不良事件发生率从基线(2008年1月至6月)到最近一次审查时间段(2011年7月至12月)下降了42%(10.7%对6.2%,p<0.001)。加权不良结果评分(WAOS)在同一时期也有所下降(3.9对2.3,p = 0.001)。鉴于已注意到的结果改善,现将我们独特的计划及其制定过程进行描述,希望其他人将认识到与保险公司合作或不合作的协作伙伴关系是改善产科患者安全的一个机会。

相似文献

1
Improved obstetric safety through programmatic collaboration.通过项目协作提高产科安全性。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014;33(3):14-22. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21131.
2
Beyond the clinic: redefining hospital ambulatory care.超越诊所:重新定义医院门诊护理。
Pap Ser United Hosp Fund N Y. 1997 Jul:1-62.
3
Using data and quality monitoring to enhance maternity outcomes: a qualitative study of risk managers' perspectives.利用数据和质量监测改善孕产妇结局:一项关于风险管理者观点的定性研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jun;23(6):457-64. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002025. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
4
Impact of a comprehensive patient safety strategy on obstetric adverse events.全面患者安全策略对产科不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):492.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.022. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
5
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
6
Evaluation and development of potentially better practices for perinatal and neonatal communication and collaboration.围产期及新生儿沟通与协作潜在更佳实践的评估与发展
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118 Suppl 2:S147-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0913L.
7
Midwifery and obstetrics: twenty years of collaborative academic practice.助产学与产科学:二十年的合作学术实践。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012 Sep;39(3):335-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
8
Working toward a common goal: a collaborative obstetrics and gynecology practice.朝着共同目标努力:合作式妇产科医疗实践。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012 Sep;39(3):373-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.05.006.
9
Implementation and case-study results of potentially better practices for collaboration between obstetrics and neonatology to achieve improved perinatal outcomes.
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118 Suppl 2:S153-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0913M.
10
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance gaps and improvement plans from a 5-hospital simulation programme for anaesthesiology providers: a retrospective study.针对麻醉医护人员的五家医院模拟项目中的绩效差距与改进计划:一项回顾性研究
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Apr 5;3(2):37-42. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000163. eCollection 2017.
2
Integrated Approach to Reduce Perinatal Adverse Events: Standardized Processes, Interdisciplinary Teamwork Training, and Performance Feedback.减少围产期不良事件的综合方法:标准化流程、跨学科团队合作培训和绩效反馈。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2431-2452. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12592. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
3
Decreasing Malpractice Claims by Reducing Preventable Perinatal Harm.
通过减少可预防的围产期伤害来降低医疗事故索赔。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2453-2471. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12551. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
Position-related injury is uncommon in robotic gynecologic surgery.与体位相关的损伤在机器人妇科手术中并不常见。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec;135(3):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 23.