• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“机会只青睐有准备的头脑”:让头脑做好准备,以便在初级保健的测试过程中系统地降低风险。

"Chance favors only the prepared mind": preparing minds to systematically reduce hazards in the testing process in primary care.

作者信息

Singh Ranjit, Hickner John, Mold Jim, Singh Gurdev

机构信息

From the *UB Patient Safety Research Center, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York; †Department of Family Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and ‡Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2014 Mar;10(1):20-8. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a5f81a.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a5f81a
PMID:24553441
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Testing plays a vital role in primary care. Failures in the process are common and can be harmful. As the great 19th century microbiologist Louis Pasteur put it "chance favors only the prepared mind." Our objective is to prepare minds in primary care practices to improve safety in the testing process. Various principles from safety science can be applied.

METHODS

A prospective methodology that uses an anonymous practice survey based on concepts from failure modes and effects analysis is proposed. Responses are used to rank perceived hazards in the testing process, leading to prioritization of areas for intervention. Secondary data analysis (using data from a study of medication safety) was used to explore the value of this approach in the context of assessing the testing process.

RESULTS

At 3 primary care practice sites, a total of 61 staff members completed 4 survey items examining the testing process. Comparison across practices shows that each has a distinct profile of hazards, which would lead each on a different path toward improvement.

DISCUSSION

The proposed approach treats each practice as a unique complex adaptive system aiming to help it thrive by inculcating trust, mutual respect, and collaboration. Implications for patient safety research and practice are discussed.

摘要

目标

检测在初级保健中起着至关重要的作用。检测过程中的失误很常见,且可能有害。正如19世纪伟大的微生物学家路易·巴斯德所说:“机遇只偏爱有准备的头脑。”我们的目标是让初级保健机构中的人员做好准备,以提高检测过程的安全性。安全科学的各种原则都可以应用。

方法

提出一种前瞻性方法,该方法基于失效模式与效应分析的概念进行匿名的机构调查。调查结果用于对检测过程中感知到的危害进行排序,从而确定干预领域的优先级。二次数据分析(使用药物安全研究的数据)用于在评估检测过程的背景下探索这种方法的价值。

结果

在3个初级保健机构中,共有61名工作人员完成了4项关于检测过程的调查项目。各机构之间的比较表明,每个机构都有独特的危害特征,这将使每个机构朝着不同的改进方向发展。

讨论

所提出的方法将每个机构视为一个独特的复杂适应系统,旨在通过灌输信任、相互尊重和协作来帮助其蓬勃发展。讨论了对患者安全研究和实践的影响。

相似文献

1
"Chance favors only the prepared mind": preparing minds to systematically reduce hazards in the testing process in primary care.“机会只青睐有准备的头脑”:让头脑做好准备,以便在初级保健的测试过程中系统地降低风险。
J Patient Saf. 2014 Mar;10(1):20-8. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a5f81a.
2
Issues and initiatives in the testing process in primary care physician offices.基层医疗医生办公室检测过程中的问题与举措
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Feb;31(2):81-9. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31012-9.
3
Risk and safety management in infertility and assisted reproductive technology (ART): from the doctor's office to the ART procedure.不孕不育与辅助生殖技术(ART)中的风险与安全管理:从医生诊室到 ART 操作。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1509-17. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
4
[Patient safety in general practice].[全科医疗中的患者安全]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
5
[Patient safety in outpatient care - study of Swiss primary care offices].[门诊护理中的患者安全——瑞士初级保健机构研究]
Ther Umsch. 2012 Jun;69(6):353-7. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000297.
6
Inequitable access: provider characteristics and reimbursement policies of primary care office sites in Milwaukee.不公平的医疗服务可及性:密尔沃基初级保健诊所的提供者特征与报销政策
WMJ. 2010 Oct;109(5):245-53.
7
Could safety boards provide a valuable tool to enhance the safety of reproductive medicine?安全委员会能否提供一个有价值的工具,以提高生殖医学的安全性?
Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1518-23. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.033.
8
Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on Errors of Omission.初级医疗服务提供者对漏诊失误的看法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;30(6):733-742. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170161.
9
The key to patient safety-quality communication.
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev. 2004 Nov-Dec;18(6):378-80.
10
Mitigation of patient harm from testing errors in family medicine offices: a report from the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network.减轻家庭医疗诊所检验错误对患者的伤害:美国家庭医师学会国家研究网络的一份报告
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):201-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022566.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: a systematic review.初级卫生保健中的患者安全与安全文化:一项系统综述
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 30;19(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0793-7.
2
System hazards in managing laboratory test requests and results in primary care: medical protection database analysis and conceptual model.基层医疗中管理实验室检查申请和结果的系统风险:医疗保障数据库分析与概念模型
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 27;5(11):e008968. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008968.
3
Trust, temporality and systems: how do patients understand patient safety in primary care? A qualitative study.
信任、时间性与系统:患者如何理解基层医疗中的患者安全?一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):253-63. doi: 10.1111/hex.12342. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
4
Creating Minimum Harm Practice ( MiHaP): a concept for continuous improvement.创建最小伤害实践(MiHaP):持续改进的概念。
F1000Res. 2013 Dec 17;2:276. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-276.v1. eCollection 2013.