• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量急诊普通外科疾病的解剖严重程度。

Measuring anatomic severity of disease in emergency general surgery.

机构信息

From the Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement (S.S.), Baylor Health Care System, Dallas; and Department of Trauma Service (C.V.-R.B.), University Medical Center Brackenridge, Austin, Texas; Department of Surgery (M.A.), Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia; Department of Surgery (D.C), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; Department of Surgery (M.J.C.), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Surgery (K.I.), Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Departments of Surgery-Trauma/Critical Care and Preventive Medicine (M.L.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and Department of General Surgery (P.R.M., N.T.M.), Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):884-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aafdba.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aafdba
PMID:24553565
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no established system for assessing disease severity in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients. The purpose of this project was to develop a uniform grading system for measuring anatomic severity of disease in this patient population.

METHODS

The Committee on Patient Assessment and Outcomes of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma developed a proposal by consensus of experts for grading severity of EGS diseases. It was then reviewed and approved by the Board of Managers of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

RESULTS

A uniform grading system for measuring anatomic severity of disease in EGS is described, with specific grades for eight commonly encountered gastrointestinal conditions. These grades range from Grade I through Grade V, reflecting an escalating clinical progression from mild disease limited within the organ itself to severe disease that is widespread.

CONCLUSION

This article provides a unified grading system for measuring anatomic severity of disease that is essential to advance the science of EGS. Once validated, a description of disease grade should be included in the emerging EGS registries and in research studies involving EGS patients.

摘要

背景

目前,尚无针对急诊普通外科(EGS)患者疾病严重程度的评估系统。本项目旨在为该患者人群制定一种用于衡量解剖严重程度的统一分级系统。

方法

美国创伤外科学会患者评估和结局委员会通过专家共识制定了一项 EGS 疾病严重程度分级提案。该提案随后经过美国创伤外科学会理事会的审查和批准。

结果

本文描述了一种用于衡量 EGS 疾病解剖严重程度的统一分级系统,其中包括八种常见的胃肠道疾病的具体分级。这些分级从 I 级到 V 级,反映了疾病从局限于器官本身的轻度进展到广泛的重度疾病的临床进展。

结论

本文提供了一种用于衡量疾病解剖严重程度的统一分级系统,这对于推进 EGS 科学至关重要。一旦得到验证,疾病分级的描述应纳入新兴的 EGS 登记处和涉及 EGS 患者的研究中。

相似文献

1
Measuring anatomic severity of disease in emergency general surgery.测量急诊普通外科疾病的解剖严重程度。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):884-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aafdba.
2
Multicenter validation of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading system for acute colonic diverticulitis and its use for emergency general surgery quality improvement program.美国创伤外科协会急性结肠憩室炎分级系统的多中心验证及其在急诊普通外科质量改进项目中的应用
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Mar;80(3):405-10; discussion 410-1. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000943.
3
Application of a uniform anatomic grading system to measure disease severity in eight emergency general surgical illnesses.应用统一的解剖学分级系统来衡量八种急诊普通外科疾病的疾病严重程度。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Nov;77(5):705-708. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000444.
4
ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM mapping of the AAST Emergency General Surgery disease severity grading systems: Conceptual approach, limitations, and recommendations for the future.美国外科学院(AAST)急诊普通外科疾病严重程度分级系统的ICD - 9 - CM与ICD - 10 - CM映射:概念方法、局限性及未来建议
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 May;78(5):1059-65. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000608.
5
Validating a new grading scale for emergency general surgery diseases.验证一种新的急诊普通外科疾病分级量表。
J Surg Res. 2015 Jun 15;196(2):264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.036. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
6
Evaluating the association between American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery anatomic severity grades and clinical outcomes using national claims data.利用国家索赔数据评估美国创伤外科学会急诊普通外科解剖严重程度分级与临床结局之间的关系。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Feb 1;90(2):296-304. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003030.
7
Emergency general surgery: definition and estimated burden of disease.急诊普通外科:定义和疾病负担估计。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Apr;74(4):1092-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827e1bc7.
8
Creation and implementation of an emergency general surgery registry modeled after the National Trauma Data Bank.创建并实施一个以国家创伤数据库为模型的急诊普通外科登记处。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Feb;214(2):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
9
Validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Emergency General Surgery Grading System for Colorectal Resection: An EAST Multicenter Study.美国创伤外科协会急诊普通外科结直肠切除分级系统的验证:一项东部创伤外科学会多中心研究
Am Surg. 2022 May;88(5):953-958. doi: 10.1177/0003134820960022. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
10
The EGS grading scale for skin and soft-tissue infections is predictive of poor outcomes: a multicenter validation study.EGS 皮肤和软组织感染分级对不良结局具有预测性:一项多中心验证研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Apr;86(4):601-608. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002175.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiological insights into diverticulitis: Clinical manifestations, complications, and differential diagnosis.憩室炎的放射学见解:临床表现、并发症及鉴别诊断
World J Radiol. 2025 Aug 28;17(8):107463. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i8.107463.
2
Validity of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Intestinal Obstruction Grading System.美国创伤外科协会肠梗阻分级系统的有效性
Surg Pract Sci. 2022 Apr 29;9:100086. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100086. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Does the Experience Level of Surgeons and Assistants Influence the Rate of Complications Following Appendicectomy?
外科医生和助手的经验水平会影响阑尾切除术后的并发症发生率吗?
Cureus. 2024 Nov 27;16(11):e74612. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74612. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Utility of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Appendicitis Severity Grade in Predicting Prognosis in Children.美国创伤外科学会阑尾炎严重程度分级在预测儿童预后中的效用
Cureus. 2024 Jul 22;16(7):e65129. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65129. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in acute appendicitis differ in the elderly patient.老年人急性阑尾炎的治疗模式和临床结局存在差异。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2155-2164. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02620-w. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
6
Learning curve of laparoscopic appendectomy in a low-resource setting: a cumulative sum analysis of operative length.在资源匮乏环境下腹腔镜阑尾切除术的学习曲线:手术时间的累积和分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):4042-4047. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10954-0. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
7
Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: CT Findings, Classifications, and a Proposal of a Structured Reporting Template.急性结肠憩室炎:CT表现、分类及结构化报告模板的建议
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;13(24):3628. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13243628.
8
What are the differences between the three most used classifications for acute colonic diverticulitis? A comparative multicenter study.三种最常用的急性结肠憩室炎分类方法有何不同?一项比较多中心研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Feb 1;96(2):326-331. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004133. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
9
The Influence of HIV Status on Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Study from South Africa.HIV 状况对急性阑尾炎的影响:来自南非的回顾性研究。
World J Surg. 2023 Nov;47(11):2608-2616. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07103-4. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
10
Adult appendicitis score versus Alvarado score: A comparative study in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.成人阑尾炎评分与阿尔瓦拉多评分:急性阑尾炎诊断的比较研究
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Jul 20;14:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.07.007. eCollection 2023 Aug.