Suppr超能文献

肠内ω-3 脂肪酸补充剂治疗成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征:系统评价与荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的随机对照试验。

Enteral omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):504-12. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3244-5. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Controversy remains as to whether enteral supplementation of ω-3 fatty acids (FA) could improve outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Thus, we did a meta-analysis and aimed to investigate the benefit and harm of enteral ω-3 FA supplementation in adult patients with ARDS.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched to find relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing enteral ω-3 FA supplementation with a control or placebo intervention in adult patients with ARDS were included. The primary outcome was all-cause 28-day mortality. We used the Cochrane Collaboration methodology.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with 955 adult patients qualified for inclusion, and all the selected trials were considered as at high risk of bias. The use of enteral ω-3 FA did not significantly reduce all-cause 28-day mortality [relative risk (RR), 0.90; 95 % confidence intervals (CI), 0.68-1.18; p = 0.44; I (2) = 31 %; random effects]. Trial sequential analysis indicated lack of firm evidence for a 20 % RR reduction in all-cause 28-day mortality. PaO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly increased in the ω-3 FA group on day 4 [weighted mean difference (WMD), 45.14; 95 % CI, 16.77-73.51; p = 0.002; I (2) = 86 %; random effects] and day 7 (WMD, 33.10; 95 % CI, 1.67-64.52; p = 0.04; I (2) = 88 %; random effects). Meta-analysis using a random effects model showed no significant differences in ventilator-free days (VFD) (WMD, 2.47 days; 95 % CI, -2.85 to 7.79; p = 0.36; I (2) = 91 %) or intensive care unit-free days (ICU) (WMD, 2.31 days; 95 % CI, -2.34 to 6.97; p = 0.33; I (2) = 89 %) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ARDS, enteral supplementation of ω-3 FA seemed ineffective regarding all-cause 28-day mortality, VFD, and ICU-free days. Routine use of enteral ω-3 FA cannot be recommended based on the available evidence.

摘要

目的

关于ω-3 脂肪酸(FA)肠内补充是否能改善急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的结局,目前仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,旨在研究 ARDS 成人患者肠内 ω-3 FA 补充的益处和危害。

方法

检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验注册库和 Google Scholar 等数据库,以寻找相关文章。纳入比较肠内 ω-3 FA 补充与 ARDS 成人对照或安慰剂干预的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局为全因 28 天死亡率。我们使用 Cochrane 协作组方法。

结果

7 项纳入了 955 名成人患者的 RCT 符合纳入标准,所有入选试验均被认为存在高偏倚风险。肠内使用 ω-3 FA 不能显著降低全因 28 天死亡率[相对风险(RR),0.90;95%置信区间(CI),0.68-1.18;p=0.44;I(2)=31%;随机效应]。试验序贯分析表明,全因 28 天死亡率降低 20%的 RR 缺乏确凿证据。ω-3 FA 组在第 4 天 PaO2/FiO2 比值显著升高[加权均数差值(WMD),45.14;95%CI,16.77-73.51;p=0.002;I(2)=86%;随机效应]和第 7 天(WMD,33.10;95%CI,1.67-64.52;p=0.04;I(2)=88%;随机效应)。采用随机效应模型的荟萃分析显示,两组间呼吸机无使用天数(VFD)[WMD,2.47 天;95%CI,-2.85 至 7.79;p=0.36;I(2)=91%]或无 ICU 天数(ICU)[WMD,2.31 天;95%CI,-2.34 至 6.97;p=0.33;I(2)=89%]无显著差异。

结论

在 ARDS 患者中,肠内补充 ω-3 FA 似乎不能降低全因 28 天死亡率、VFD 或 ICU 无使用天数。根据现有证据,不能常规推荐肠内使用 ω-3 FA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验