Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Suite 18-206, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Oct;38(10):1573-82. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2682-1. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
Our objective was to revise the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) using a conceptual model incorporating reliability and validity, and a novel iterative approach with formal evaluation of the definition.
The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine identified three chairs with broad expertise in ARDS who selected the participants and created the agenda. After 2 days of consensus discussions a draft definition was developed, which then underwent empiric evaluation followed by consensus revision.
The Berlin Definition of ARDS maintains a link to prior definitions with diagnostic criteria of timing, chest imaging, origin of edema, and hypoxemia. Patients may have ARDS if the onset is within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new/worsening respiratory symptoms. For the bilateral opacities on chest radiograph criterion, a reference set of chest radiographs has been developed to enhance inter-observer reliability. The pulmonary artery wedge pressure criterion for hydrostatic edema was removed, and illustrative vignettes were created to guide judgments about the primary cause of respiratory failure. If no risk factor for ARDS is apparent, however, objective evaluation (e.g., echocardiography) is required to help rule out hydrostatic edema. A minimum level of positive end-expiratory pressure and mutually exclusive PaO(2)/FiO(2) thresholds were chosen for the different levels of ARDS severity (mild, moderate, severe) to better categorize patients with different outcomes and potential responses to therapy.
This panel addressed some of the limitations of the prior ARDS definition by incorporating current data, physiologic concepts, and clinical trials results to develop the Berlin definition, which should facilitate case recognition and better match treatment options to severity in both research trials and clinical practice.
本研究旨在通过采用可靠性和有效性概念模型以及具有正式定义评估的新型迭代方法,对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的定义进行修订。
欧洲危重病医学会确定了 3 名具有 ARDS 广泛专业知识的主席,他们选择了参与者并制定了议程。经过 2 天的共识讨论,制定了一份草案定义,然后对该定义进行了实证评估,随后进行了共识修订。
柏林 ARDS 定义与先前的定义保持联系,其诊断标准包括时间、胸部影像学、水肿来源和低氧血症。如果患者在已知临床损伤或新出现/恶化的呼吸症状后 1 周内出现发病,则可能患有 ARDS。对于胸部 X 线摄影双侧混浊的标准,开发了一组参考胸部 X 线摄影,以提高观察者间的可靠性。去除了肺动脉楔压标准用于静水压力性水肿,并创建了说明性病例,以指导对呼吸衰竭主要原因的判断。然而,如果没有 ARDS 的明显风险因素,则需要进行客观评估(例如,超声心动图)以帮助排除静水压力性水肿。选择了不同 ARDS 严重程度(轻度、中度、重度)的最小水平呼气末正压和相互排斥的 PaO 2 / FiO 2 阈值,以更好地对不同结局和潜在治疗反应的患者进行分类。
该小组通过纳入当前数据、生理学概念和临床试验结果来解决先前 ARDS 定义的一些局限性,制定了柏林定义,这应该有助于在研究试验和临床实践中识别病例,并更好地根据严重程度匹配治疗选择。