P.W. Stratford, PT, MSc, Institute for Applied Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main St W, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada LS8 1C7.
D.M. Kennedy, PT, MSc, Holland Orthopaedic & Arthritic Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre-Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Phys Ther. 2014 Jun;94(6):838-44. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130399. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
The Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) has received considerable attention over the last 2 decades; however, validation studies have not examined its performance in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of the PSFS to detect change in patients post-TKA by comparing PSFS change scores with Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and pooled impairment change scores.
One hundred thirty-three patients participating in a post-TKA exercise class were assessed at their initial and discharge visits. Initial assessments occurred within 28 days of arthroplasty; follow-up assessments occurred within 80 days of surgery. At both assessments, participants completed the PSFS, LEFS, and the P4 pain measure, and their knee range of motion (ROM) and extensor strength were measured. The ability to detect change was expressed as the standardized response mean (SRM) and as a correlation between the PSFS change scores and 2 reference standards: (1) LEFS change scores and (2) pooled impairment change scores. The pooled impairment measure consisted of pain, ROM, and strength change scores.
The SRMs were PSFS 4.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]=4.00, 5.36) for the PSFS and 2.28 (95% CI=2.04, 2.60) for the LEFS. The correlation between the PSFS and pooled impairment change scores was 0.12 (95% CI=-0.04, 0.25), and the correlation between the PSFS and LEFS changes scores was 0.18 (0.02, 0.34).
The order of measure administration was not standardized, and fixed activity set does not reflect clinical application in many instances.
The results suggest that the PSFS is adept at detecting improvement in patients post-TKA but that the PSFS, like other patient-specific measures, is likely to be of limited value in distinguishing different levels of change among patients.
患者特异性功能量表(PSFS)在过去的 20 年中受到了广泛关注;然而,验证研究并未检查其在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者中的表现。
本研究旨在通过比较 PSFS 变化评分与下肢功能量表(LEFS)和综合损伤变化评分,来研究 PSFS 在 TKA 后患者中检测变化的能力。
133 名参加 TKA 术后锻炼班的患者在初次就诊和出院时接受评估。初次评估在关节置换后 28 天内进行;随访评估在手术后 80 天内进行。在两次评估中,参与者都完成了 PSFS、LEFS 和 P4 疼痛量表,同时测量了他们的膝关节活动范围(ROM)和伸肌力量。变化检测能力的表达为标准化反应均值(SRM)以及 PSFS 变化评分与两个参考标准之间的相关性:(1)LEFS 变化评分,(2)综合损伤变化评分。综合损伤测量包括疼痛、ROM 和力量变化评分。
PSFS 的 SRM 为 4.60(95%置信区间[CI]=4.00,5.36),LEFS 的 SRM 为 2.28(95% CI=2.04,2.60)。PSFS 与综合损伤变化评分之间的相关性为 0.12(95% CI=-0.04,0.25),PSFS 与 LEFS 变化评分之间的相关性为 0.18(0.02,0.34)。
测量的实施顺序没有标准化,且固定的活动设置在许多情况下都无法反映临床应用。
结果表明,PSFS 善于检测 TKA 后患者的改善,但 PSFS 与其他患者特异性测量方法一样,在区分患者之间不同程度的变化方面可能价值有限。