Suppr超能文献

肉毒中毒的医学治疗。

Medical treatment for botulism.

作者信息

Chalk Colin H, Benstead Tim J, Keezer Mark

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital - Room L7-313, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1A4.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 20(2):CD008123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008123.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Botulism is an acute paralytic illness caused by a neurotoxin produced by Clostridium botulinum. Supportive care, including intensive care, is key but the role of other medical treatments is unclear. This is an update of a review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of medical treatments on mortality, duration of hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, tube or parenteral feeding and risk of adverse events in botulism.

SEARCH METHODS

On 30 March 2013, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (30 March 2013), CENTRAL (2013, Issue 3) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2013) and EMBASE (January 1980 to March 2013). We reviewed bibliographies and contacted authors and experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials examining the medical treatment of any of the four major types of botulism (infant intestinal botulism, food-borne botulism, wound botulism and adult intestinal toxemia). Potential medical treatments included equine serum trivalent botulism antitoxin, human-derived botulinum immune globulin, plasma exchange, 3,4-diaminopyridine and guanidine.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data onto data extraction forms.Our primary outcome was in-hospital death from any cause occurring within four weeks. Secondary outcomes were death occurring within 12 weeks, duration of hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, tube or parenteral feeding and risk of adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

A single randomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria. We found no additional trials when we updated the searches in 2013. This trial evaluated human-derived botulinum immune globulin (BIG) for the treatment of infant botulism and included 59 treatment participants as well as 63 control participants. The control group received a control immune globulin which did not have an effect on botulinum toxin. In this trial there was some violation of intention-to-treat principles, and possibly some between-treatment group imbalances among those participants admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanically ventilated, but overall we judged the risk of bias to be low. There were no deaths in either group, making any treatment effect on mortality inestimable. There was a significant benefit in the treatment group on mean duration of hospitalization (BIG: 2.60 weeks, 95% CI 1.95 to 3.25; control: 5.70 weeks, 95% CI 4.40 to 7.00; mean difference (MD) 3.10 weeks, 95% CI 1.68 to 4.52), mechanical ventilation (BIG: 1.80 weeks, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.40; control: 4.40 weeks, 95% CI 3.00 to 5.80; MD 2.60 weeks, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.06), and tube or parenteral feeding (BIG: 3.60 weeks, 95% CI 1.70 to 5.50; control: 10.00 weeks, 95% CI 6.85 to 13.15; MD 6.40 weeks, 95% CI 2.80 to 10.00) but not on risk of adverse events or complications (BIG: 63.08%; control: 68.75%; risk ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.18; absolute risk reduction 0.06, 95% CI 0.22 to -0.11).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence supporting the use of human-derived botulinum immune globulin (BIG) in infant intestinal botulism. A single randomized controlled trial demonstrated significant decreases in the duration of hospitalization, mechanical ventilation and tube or parenteral feeding with BIG treatment. This evidence was of moderate quality for effects on duration of mechanical ventilation but was otherwise of high quality. Our search did not reveal any evidence examining the use of other medical treatments including serum trivalent botulism antitoxin.

摘要

背景

肉毒中毒是由肉毒杆菌产生的神经毒素引起的急性麻痹性疾病。支持性治疗,包括重症监护,是关键,但其他医学治疗的作用尚不清楚。这是2011年首次发表的一篇综述的更新。

目的

评估医学治疗对肉毒中毒患者死亡率、住院时间、机械通气、管饲或胃肠外营养以及不良事件风险的影响。

检索方法

2013年3月30日,我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉疾病组专业注册库(2013年3月30日)、Cochrane图书馆中的CENTRAL(2013年第3期)、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2013年3月)和EMBASE(1980年1月至2013年3月)。我们查阅了参考文献,并联系了作者和专家。

入选标准

随机和半随机对照试验,研究四种主要类型肉毒中毒(婴儿肠道肉毒中毒、食源性肉毒中毒、创伤性肉毒中毒和成人肠道毒血症)中任何一种的医学治疗。潜在的医学治疗包括马血清三价肉毒抗毒素、人源性肉毒免疫球蛋白、血浆置换、3,4-二氨基吡啶和胍。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立选择研究、评估偏倚风险并将数据提取到数据提取表上。我们的主要结局是四周内任何原因导致的院内死亡。次要结局是12周内的死亡、住院时间、机械通气、管饲或胃肠外营养以及不良事件风险。

主要结果

一项随机对照试验符合纳入标准。2013年更新检索时未发现其他试验。该试验评估了人源性肉毒免疫球蛋白(BIG)治疗婴儿肉毒中毒的效果,包括59名治疗参与者和63名对照参与者。对照组接受对肉毒毒素无作用的对照免疫球蛋白。在该试验中,存在一些违反意向性分析原则的情况,在入住重症监护病房(ICU)并接受机械通气的参与者中,治疗组之间可能也存在一些不均衡,但总体而言,我们判断偏倚风险较低。两组均无死亡,因此无法评估任何治疗对死亡率的影响。治疗组在平均住院时间(BIG:2.60周,95%可信区间1.95至3.25;对照:5.70周,95%可信区间4.40至7.00;平均差值(MD)3.10周,95%可信区间1.68至4.52)、机械通气(BIG:1.80周,95%可信区间1.20至2.40;对照:4.40周,95%可信区间3.00至5.80;MD 2.60周,95%可信区间1.14至4.06)以及管饲或胃肠外营养(BIG:3.60周,95%可信区间1.70至5.50;对照:10.00周,95%可信区间6.85至13.15;MD 6.40周,95%可信区间2.80至10.00)方面有显著益处,但在不良事件或并发症风险方面无显著差异(BIG:63.08%;对照:68.75%;风险比0.92,95%可信区间0.72至1.18;绝对风险降低0.06,95%可信区间0.22至 -0.11)。

作者结论

有证据支持在婴儿肠道肉毒中毒中使用人源性肉毒免疫球蛋白(BIG)。一项随机对照试验表明,BIG治疗可显著缩短住院时间、机械通气时间以及管饲或胃肠外营养时间。该证据对机械通气时间影响的质量为中等,但其他方面质量较高。我们的检索未发现任何关于使用其他医学治疗(包括血清三价肉毒抗毒素)的证据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验