Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison St., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Research and Development Department, IDEXX Laboratories, Westbrook, ME, USA.
Vet Microbiol. 2014 Jun 4;170(3-4):197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
Antibody testing based on individual risk assessments is recommended to determine feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) status, but ELISA and Western blot tests cannot distinguish between anti-FIV antibodies produced in response to natural infection and those produced in response to FIV vaccination. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to test the hypothesis that FIV-infected cats could be differentiated from FIV-vaccinated uninfected cats using lymphocyte subset results, specifically the CD4%:CD8(low)% T-lymphocyte ratio. Comparisons of the CD4%:CD8(low)% T-lymphocyte ratio were made among the following four groups: Group 1 - FIV-infected cats (n=61; FIV-antibody positive by ELISA and FIV PCR positive); Group 2 - FIV-uninfected cats (n=96; FIV-antibody negative by ELISA); Group 3 - FIV-vaccinated uninfected cats (n=31; FIV-antibody negative by ELISA before being vaccinated against FIV, after which they tested FIV ELISA positive); and Group 4 - FIV-uninfected but under chronic/active antigenic stimulation (n=16; FIV-antibody negative by ELISA; all had active clinical signs of either upper respiratory tract disease or gingival disease for ≥ 21 days). The median CD4%:CD8(low)% T-lymphocyte ratio was lower in Group 1 (1.39) than in each of the other three groups (Group 2 - 9.77, Group 3 - 9.72, Group 4 - 5.64; P<0.05). The CD4%:CD8(low)% T-lymphocyte ratio was also the most effective discriminator between FIV-infected cats and the other three groups, and areas under ROC curves ranged from 0.91 (compared with Group 4) to 0.96 (compared with Group 3). CD4%:CD8(low)% shows promise as an effective test to differentiate between FIV-infected cats and FIV-vaccinated uninfected cats.
基于个体风险评估的抗体检测被推荐用于确定猫免疫缺陷病毒(FIV)状态,但 ELISA 和 Western blot 检测无法区分针对自然感染产生的抗 FIV 抗体和针对 FIV 疫苗接种产生的抗 FIV 抗体。本横断面研究旨在检验以下假设,即通过淋巴细胞亚群结果(特别是 CD4%:CD8(low)%T 淋巴细胞比值),可以区分 FIV 感染猫和 FIV 疫苗接种未感染猫。对以下四个组的 CD4%:CD8(low)%T 淋巴细胞比值进行了比较:第 1 组 - FIV 感染猫(n=61;ELISA 检测抗 FIV 抗体阳性且 FIV PCR 阳性);第 2 组 - FIV 未感染猫(n=96;ELISA 检测抗 FIV 抗体阴性);第 3 组 - FIV 疫苗接种未感染猫(n=31;接种 FIV 疫苗前 ELISA 检测抗 FIV 抗体阴性,接种后 ELISA 检测抗 FIV 抗体阳性);第 4 组 - FIV 未感染但处于慢性/活跃抗原刺激下(n=16;ELISA 检测抗 FIV 抗体阴性;所有猫均有上呼吸道疾病或牙龈疾病的活跃临床症状,持续时间≥21 天)。第 1 组(1.39)的 CD4%:CD8(low)%T 淋巴细胞比值中位数低于其他三组(第 2 组 - 9.77,第 3 组 - 9.72,第 4 组 - 5.64;P<0.05)。CD4%:CD8(low)%T 淋巴细胞比值也是区分 FIV 感染猫和其他三组的最有效判别指标,ROC 曲线下面积范围从 0.91(与第 4 组相比)到 0.96(与第 3 组相比)。CD4%:CD8(low)%显示出作为区分 FIV 感染猫和 FIV 疫苗接种未感染猫的有效检测方法的潜力。