Suppr超能文献

冠心病与外周动脉疾病患者的脂质管理比较。

Comparison of lipid management in patients with coronary versus peripheral arterial disease.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Kansas Medical Center and Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center and Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2014 Apr 15;113(8):1320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.01.405. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), similar to coronary artery disease (CAD), is a significant predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) goal of <100 mg/dl for both groups. We assessed whether lipid control and statin use were as aggressively applied to PAD as to patients with CAD. This retrospective study of patients with the diagnosis of CAD, PAD, or both CAD and PAD compared lipid levels and statin use. For comparison of statins, we used a statin potency unit (1 potency unit=10 mg of simvastatin). Among 11,134 subjects (CAD 9,563, PAD 596, and both CAD and PAD 975), mean LDL in the PAD group was higher than the CAD (92 vs 83 mg/dl, respectively, p<0.001) and the combined CAD and PAD groups (92 vs 80 mg/dl, respectively, p<0.001). Fewer patients with PAD achieved a target LDL of <100 mg/dl compared with CAD (62% vs 78%, respectively, p<0.001) and the combined group (62% vs 79%, respectively, p<0.001). Similar differences were noted for a target LDL of <70 mg/dl. Compared with the CAD group, a lesser number of patients with PAD received statin therapy (76% vs 100%, respectively, p<0.001) with lower mean potency unit (5.3 vs 8.1, respectively, p<0.001). In conclusion, our study demonstrated lower use and less aggressive application of statins in patients with PAD compared with patients with CAD, ensuing lower mean LDL in the CAD and combined PAD and CAD groups. Our study suggests that physicians are more aggressive with lipid control in patients with CAD compared with patients with PAD alone.

摘要

外周动脉疾病(PAD)与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)相似,是心血管发病率和死亡率的重要预测因素。指南建议两组的低密度脂蛋白(LDL)目标值均<100mg/dl。我们评估了在 PAD 患者中的降脂治疗和他汀类药物的应用是否与 CAD 患者一样积极。这项回顾性研究比较了 CAD、PAD 或 CAD 和 PAD 两者均有的患者的血脂水平和他汀类药物的使用情况。为了比较他汀类药物的使用,我们使用了他汀类药物效力单位(1 个效力单位=10mg 辛伐他汀)。在 11134 名患者(CAD9563 例,PAD596 例,CAD 和 PAD 均有 975 例)中,PAD 组的平均 LDL 高于 CAD(分别为 92 与 83mg/dl,p<0.001)和 CAD 和 PAD 合并组(分别为 92 与 80mg/dl,p<0.001)。与 CAD 组相比,较少的 PAD 患者达到 LDL<100mg/dl 的目标值(分别为 62%和 78%,p<0.001),与 CAD 和 PAD 合并组相比,较少的 PAD 患者达到 LDL<100mg/dl 的目标值(分别为 62%和 79%,p<0.001)。对于 LDL<70mg/dl 的目标值,也观察到类似的差异。与 CAD 组相比,接受他汀类药物治疗的 PAD 患者人数较少(分别为 76%和 100%,p<0.001),平均效力单位较低(分别为 5.3 和 8.1,p<0.001)。总之,与 CAD 患者相比,我们的研究显示 PAD 患者他汀类药物的使用率较低,应用也不那么积极,导致 CAD 和 PAD 合并组的平均 LDL 水平较低。我们的研究表明,与单独患有 PAD 的患者相比,医生在 CAD 患者的血脂控制方面更为积极。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验