Mitra Biswadev, Olaussen Alexander, Cameron Peter A, O'Donohoe Tom, Fitzgerald Mark
Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Australia; Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia; National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital, Australia.
Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Australia; Trauma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Australia.
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
Older age and blood transfusion have both been independently associated with higher mortality post trauma and the combination is expected to be associated with catastrophic outcomes. Among patients who received a massive transfusion post trauma, we aimed to investigate mortality at hospital discharge of patients ≥65 years old and explore variables associated with poor outcomes.
A retrospective review of registry data on all major trauma patients presenting to a level I trauma centre between 2006 and 2011 was conducted. Mortality at hospital discharge among patients ≥65 years old was compared to the younger cohort. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to determine independent risk-factors for mortality among older patients.
There were 51 (16.4%) patients of age ≥65 years who received a massive transfusion. There were 20 (39.2%) deaths, a proportion significantly higher than 55 (21.1%) deaths among younger patients (p<0.01). Pre-hospital GCS, the presence of acute traumatic coagulopathy and higher systolic blood pressure on presentation were independently associated with higher mortality. Age and volume of red cells transfused were not significantly associated with higher mortality.
Survival to hospital discharge was demonstrated in elderly patients receiving massive transfusions post trauma, even in the presence of multiple risk factors for mortality. Restrictive resuscitation or transfusion on the basis of age alone cannot be supported. Early aggressive resuscitation of elderly trauma patients along specific guidelines directed at the geriatric population is justified and may further improve outcomes.
高龄和输血均与创伤后较高的死亡率独立相关,两者结合预计会导致灾难性后果。在创伤后接受大量输血的患者中,我们旨在调查65岁及以上患者出院时的死亡率,并探讨与不良预后相关的变量。
对2006年至2011年间在一级创伤中心就诊的所有主要创伤患者的登记数据进行回顾性分析。将65岁及以上患者出院时的死亡率与年轻队列进行比较。构建多变量逻辑回归模型以确定老年患者死亡的独立危险因素。
51名(16.4%)年龄≥65岁的患者接受了大量输血。其中20名(39.2%)死亡,这一比例显著高于年轻患者中的55名(21.1%)死亡(p<0.01)。院前格拉斯哥昏迷评分、急性创伤性凝血病的存在以及就诊时较高的收缩压与较高的死亡率独立相关。年龄和输注红细胞的量与较高的死亡率无显著相关性。
创伤后接受大量输血的老年患者即使存在多种死亡风险因素,仍能存活至出院。仅基于年龄进行限制性复苏或输血是不可行的。按照针对老年人群的特定指南对老年创伤患者进行早期积极复苏是合理的,可能会进一步改善预后。