McNeil Ryan, Small Will
British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;106:151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.051. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
There is growing acknowledgment that social, structural, and environmental forces produce vulnerability to health harms among people who inject drugs (PWID), and safer environment interventions (SEI) have been identified as critical to mitigating the impacts of these contextual forces on drug-related harm. To date, however, SEIs have been under-theorized in the literature, and how they minimize drug-related risks across intervention types and settings has not been adequately examined. This article presents findings from a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies reporting PWID's experiences with three types of SEIs (syringe exchange programmes, supervised injection facilities and peer-based harm reduction interventions) published between 1997 and 2012. This meta-synthesis sought to develop a comprehensive understanding of SEIs informed by the experiences of PWID. Twenty-nine papers representing twenty-one unique studies that included an aggregate of more than 800 PWID were included in this meta-synthesis. This meta-synthesis found that SEIs fostered social and physical environments that mitigated drug-related harms and increased access to social and material resources. Specifically, SEIs: (1) provided refuge from street-based drug scenes; (2) enabled safer injecting by reshaping the social and environmental contexts of injection drug use; (3) mediated access to resources and health care services; and, (4) were constrained by drug prohibition and law enforcement activities. These findings indicate that it is critical to situate SEIs in relation to the lived experiences of PWID, and in particular provide broader environmental support to PWID. Given that existing drug laws limit the effectiveness of interventions, drug policy reforms are needed to enable public health, and specifically SEIs, to occupy a more prominent role in the response to injection drug use.
人们越来越认识到,社会、结构和环境因素会使注射毒品者(PWID)面临健康危害,而更安全环境干预措施(SEI)已被视为减轻这些背景因素对毒品相关危害影响的关键。然而,迄今为止,SEI在文献中的理论阐述不足,其如何在不同干预类型和环境中降低毒品相关风险也未得到充分研究。本文介绍了一项对定性研究的系统综述和元综合分析的结果,这些定性研究报告了1997年至2012年间PWID在三种SEI(注射器交换计划、监督注射设施和基于同伴的减少伤害干预措施)方面的经历。这项元综合分析旨在通过PWID的经历全面了解SEI。该元综合分析纳入了29篇论文,代表21项独特研究,共涉及800多名PWID。这项元综合分析发现,SEI营造了社会和物质环境,减轻了毒品相关危害,并增加了获得社会和物质资源的机会。具体而言,SEI:(1)提供了远离街头毒品场景的庇护所;(2)通过重塑注射吸毒的社会和环境背景实现更安全的注射;(3)促进了资源和医疗服务的获取;(4)受到毒品禁令和执法活动的限制。这些发现表明,将SEI与PWID的实际生活经历相结合至关重要,特别是要为PWID提供更广泛的环境支持。鉴于现行毒品法律限制了干预措施的有效性,需要进行毒品政策改革,以使公共卫生,特别是SEI,在应对注射吸毒问题中发挥更突出的作用。