H&TRC - Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL - Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Research Institute for Medicines (iMED.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, Lisbon, Portugal.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Feb 4;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00439-9.
This study aimed to synthetize the evidence on the effectiveness of harm minimization interventions on reducing blood-borne infection transmission and injecting behaviors among people who inject drugs (PWID) through a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews and evidence gap mapping.
A systematic review was conducted with searches in PubMed and Scopus to identify systematic reviews assessing the impact of interventions aimed at reducing the harms associated with injectable drug use. The overall characteristics of the studies were extracted and their methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2. An evidence gap map was constructed, highlighting the most frequently reported outcomes by intervention (CRD42023387713).
Thirty-three systematic reviews were included. Of these, 14 (42.2%) assessed the impact of needle/syringe exchange programs (NSEP) and 11 (33.3%) examined opioid agonist therapy (OAT). These interventions are likely to be associated with reductions of HIV/HCV incidence (10-40% risk reduction for NSEP; 50-60% for OAT) and sharing injecting paraphernalia (50% for NSEP, 25-85% for OAT), particularly when combined (moderate evidence). Behavioral/educational interventions were assessed in 12 reviews (36.4%) with most authors in favor/partially in favor of the use of these approaches (moderate evidence). Take-home naloxone programs and supervised-injection facilities were each assessed in two studies (6.1%), which reported inconclusive results (limited/inconsistent evidence). Most authors reported high levels of heterogeneity and risk of bias. Other interventions and outcomes were inadequately reported. Most systematic reviews presented low or critically low quality.
The evidence is sufficient to support the effectiveness of OAT, NSEP and their combination in reducing blood-borne infection transmission and certain injecting behaviors among PWID. However, evidence of other harm minimizations interventions in different settings and for some outcomes remain insufficient.
本研究旨在通过综合系统评价和证据差距图,综合评估减少伤害干预措施在降低注射吸毒者(PWID)血液传播感染和注射行为方面的有效性。
在 PubMed 和 Scopus 中进行系统检索,以确定评估旨在减少与注射吸毒相关危害的干预措施影响的系统评价。提取研究的总体特征,并使用 AMSTAR-2 评估其方法学质量。构建证据差距图,突出干预措施最常报告的结果(CRD42023387713)。
共纳入 33 项系统评价。其中,14 项(42.2%)评估了针具/注射器交换计划(NSEP)的影响,11 项(33.3%)研究了阿片类药物替代疗法(OAT)。这些干预措施可能与降低 HIV/HCV 发病率(NSEP 降低 10-40%风险;OAT 降低 50-60%)和共用注射用具(NSEP 降低 50%,OAT 降低 25-85%)有关,特别是当两者结合使用时(中等证据)。12 项系统评价(36.4%)评估了行为/教育干预措施,大多数作者赞成/部分赞成使用这些方法(中等证据)。带回家的纳洛酮方案和监督注射设施分别在两项研究中进行了评估(6.1%),报告结果不确定(有限/不一致的证据)。大多数作者报告存在高水平的异质性和偏倚风险。其他干预措施和结果报告不足。大多数系统评价的质量较低或严重不足。
有足够的证据支持 OAT、NSEP 及其联合应用在降低 PWID 血液传播感染和某些注射行为方面的有效性。然而,在不同环境下和某些结果方面,其他减少伤害干预措施的证据仍然不足。