Litvin Taras V, Ozawa Glen Y, Bresnick George H, Cuadros Jorge A, Muller Matthew S, Elsner Ann E, Gast Thomas J
*OD †MD, MPA ‡OD, PhD §MS ∥PhD **MD, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Optometry, Berkeley, California (TVL, GYO, GHB, JAC); Aeon Imaging, LLC, Bloomington, Indiana (MSM, AEE, TJG); Indiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana (AEE, TJG); and EyePACS, LLC, San Jose, California (GHB, JAC).
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Apr;91(4):370-5. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000205.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether hard exudates (HEs) within one disc diameter of the foveola is an acceptable criterion for the referral of diabetic patients suspected of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) in a screening setting.
One hundred forty-three adults diagnosed as having diabetes mellitus were imaged using a nonmydriatic digital fundus camera at the Alameda County Medical Center in Oakland, CA. Nonstereo fundus images were graded independently for the presence of HE near the center of the macula by two graders according to the EyePACS grading protocol. The patients also received a dilated fundus examination on a separate visit. Clinically significant macular edema was determined during the dilated fundus examination using the criteria set forth by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Subsequently, the sensitivity and specificity of HEs within one disc diameter of the foveola in nonstereo digital images used as a surrogate for the detection of CSME diagnosed by live fundus examination were calculated.
The mean (±SD) age of 103 patients included in the analysis was 56 ± 17 years. Clinically significant macular edema was diagnosed in 15.5% of eyes during the dilated examination. For the right eyes, the sensitivity of HEs within one disc diameter from the foveola as a surrogate for detecting CSME was 93.8% for each of the graders; the specificity values were 88.5 and 85.1%. For the left eyes, the sensitivity values were 93.8 and 75% for each of the two graders, respectively; the specificity was 87.4% for both graders.
This study supports the use of HE within a disc diameter of the center of the macula in nonstereo digital images for CSME detection in a screening setting.
本研究旨在确定在筛查环境中,黄斑中心凹一个视盘直径范围内出现硬性渗出(HEs)是否可作为疑似患有临床显著性黄斑水肿(CSME)的糖尿病患者转诊的可接受标准。
在加利福尼亚州奥克兰市阿拉米达县医疗中心,使用免散瞳数字眼底相机对143名被诊断患有糖尿病的成年人进行成像。根据EyePACS分级方案,由两名分级人员对非立体眼底图像中黄斑中心附近的HEs存在情况进行独立分级。患者还在另一次就诊时接受了散瞳眼底检查。在散瞳眼底检查期间,根据早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究制定的标准确定临床显著性黄斑水肿。随后,计算在非立体数字图像中黄斑中心凹一个视盘直径范围内的HEs作为通过活体眼底检查诊断的CSME检测替代指标的敏感性和特异性。
纳入分析的103名患者的平均(±标准差)年龄为56±17岁。在散瞳检查期间,15.5%的眼睛被诊断为临床显著性黄斑水肿。对于右眼,两名分级人员将黄斑中心凹一个视盘直径范围内的HEs作为检测CSME替代指标的敏感性均为93.8%;特异性值分别为88.5%和85.1%。对于左眼,两名分级人员的敏感性值分别为93.8%和75%;两名分级人员的特异性均为87.4%。
本研究支持在筛查环境中,使用非立体数字图像中黄斑中心一个视盘直径范围内的HEs来检测CSME。