de Martino Michela, Shariat Shahrokh F, Hofbauer Sebastian L, Lucca Ilaria, Taus Christopher, Wiener Helene G, Haitel Andrea, Susani Martin, Klatte Tobias
Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
World J Urol. 2015 Jan;33(1):105-10. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1267-8. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
To evaluate urinary Aurora A Kinase (AURKA) mRNA expression as a diagnostic biomarker for urothelial bladder cancer (UBC).
One hundred and eighty-eight urine samples from patients with UBC (n = 122) and controls with hematuria (n = 66) were investigated. AURKA expression was quantified using real-time PCR and compared with voided urinary cytology. Associations with stage and grade were assessed. The area under curve was used to quantify the predictive accuracy (PA).
The sensitivity and the specificity of AURKA for UBC were 83.6 and 65.2 %, respectively (PA = 74.4 %). Among those with detectable AURKA, the quantity of expression was similar in cases and controls. Compared with Ta, tumors staged T1 and T2 showed a 9.31-fold and 4.78-fold increased AURKA expression (p = 0.034), respectively. Further, high-grade tumors showed 5.33-fold higher expression levels than low-grade tumors (p = 0.031). AURKA and urinary cytology showed similar overall PA for UBC detection (74.4 vs. 72.1 %, p = 0.588). For low-grade tumors, AURKA was more accurate (72.5 vs. 59.0 %, p = 0.004), while cytology was more accurate for high-grade lesions (76.8 vs. 89.1 %, p = 0.011).
In patients with hematuria, AURKA is associated with the presence and grade of UBC, suggesting a role as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. As AURKA is more accurate in low-grade tumors but less accurate in high-grade tumors than urinary cytology, both could be complementary in detecting UBC.
评估尿中极光激酶A(AURKA)mRNA表达作为尿路上皮膀胱癌(UBC)诊断生物标志物的价值。
对188份尿液样本进行研究,其中UBC患者122例,血尿对照者66例。采用实时PCR对AURKA表达进行定量,并与排尿后尿细胞学检查结果进行比较。评估其与分期和分级的相关性。用曲线下面积来量化预测准确性(PA)。
AURKA对UBC的敏感性和特异性分别为83.6%和65.2%(PA = 74.4%)。在可检测到AURKA的患者中,病例组和对照组的表达量相似。与Ta期肿瘤相比,T1期和T2期肿瘤的AURKA表达分别增加了9.31倍和4.78倍(p = 0.034)。此外,高级别肿瘤的表达水平比低级别肿瘤高5.33倍(p = 0.031)。AURKA和尿细胞学检查对UBC检测的总体PA相似(74.4%对72.1%,p = 0.588)。对于低级别肿瘤,AURKA更准确(72.5%对59.0%,p = 0.004),而细胞学检查对高级别病变更准确(76.8%对89.1%,p = 0.011)。
在血尿患者中,AURKA与UBC的存在及分级相关,提示其可作为诊断和预后生物标志物。由于AURKA在低级别肿瘤中比尿细胞学检查更准确,但在高级别肿瘤中准确性较低,两者在检测UBC时可相互补充。