Heuveline Patrick, Timberlake Jeffrey M
Population Research Center at NORC and the University of Chicago, 1155 E. 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 (
Department of Sociology, University of Cincinnati, P.O. Box 210378, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0378.
J Marriage Fam. 2004 Dec 1;66(5):1214-1230. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00088.x.
The prevalence of nonmarital cohabitation is steadily increasing in the United States. In evaluating the contribution of this new living arrangement to family formation, analysts have relied primarily on comparisons between individuals who cohabit and those who do not. We complement this line of inquiry by comparing the United States and 16 industrialized nations. We first identify six conceptually distinct ideal types of cohabitation with respect to family formation. We then propose empirical indicators to distinguish between the different ideal types, and estimate the values of these indicators for each of the 17 nations. Our findings indicate that although a number of countries fit an empirical pattern corresponding to one ideal type, cohabitation in the United States is more difficult to characterize.
在美国,非婚同居的比例正在稳步上升。在评估这种新的生活安排对家庭形成的贡献时,分析人士主要依赖于对同居者和非同居者的比较。我们通过比较美国和16个工业化国家来补充这一研究思路。我们首先确定了六种在家庭形成方面概念上不同的同居理想类型。然后,我们提出了实证指标来区分不同的理想类型,并估计了这17个国家中每个国家这些指标的值。我们的研究结果表明,尽管许多国家符合一种与某一理想类型相对应的实证模式,但美国的同居情况更难描述。