BMC Genomics. 2014;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-S1-S4. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
Reliable prediction of stability changes induced by a single amino acid substitution is an important aspect of computational protein design. Several machine learning methods capable of predicting stability changes from the protein sequence alone have been introduced. Prediction performance of these methods is evaluated on mutations unseen during training. Nevertheless, different mutations of the same protein, and even the same residue, as encountered during training are commonly used for evaluation. We argue that a faithful evaluation can be achieved only when a method is tested on previously unseen proteins with low sequence similarity to the training set.
We provided experimental evidence of the limitations of the evaluation commonly used for assessing the prediction performance. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the prediction of stability changes in previously unseen non-homologous proteins is a challenging task for currently available methods. To improve the prediction performance of our previously proposed method, we identified features which led to over-fitting and further extended the model with new features. The new method employs Evolutionary And Structural Encodings with Amino Acid parameters (EASE-AA). Evaluated with an independent test set of more than 600 mutations, EASE-AA yielded a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.36 and was able to classify correctly 66% of the stabilising and 74% of the destabilising mutations. For real-value prediction, EASE-AA achieved the correlation of predicted and experimentally measured stability changes of 0.51.
Commonly adopted evaluation with mutations in the same protein, and even the same residue, randomly divided between the training and test sets lead to an overestimation of prediction performance. Therefore, stability changes prediction methods should be evaluated only on mutations in previously unseen non-homologous proteins. Under such an evaluation, EASE-AA predicts stability changes more reliably than currently available methods.
可靠地预测单个氨基酸取代引起的稳定性变化是计算蛋白质设计的一个重要方面。已经引入了几种能够仅从蛋白质序列预测稳定性变化的机器学习方法。这些方法的预测性能是在训练过程中未见过的突变体上进行评估的。然而,在训练过程中经常使用相同蛋白质的不同突变体,甚至相同的残基进行评估。我们认为,只有当方法在与训练集序列相似性低的先前未见的蛋白质上进行测试时,才能实现真实的评估。
我们提供了实验证据,证明了通常用于评估预测性能的评估方法存在局限性。此外,我们证明了预测先前未见的非同源蛋白质的稳定性变化对于当前可用的方法来说是一项具有挑战性的任务。为了提高我们之前提出的方法的预测性能,我们确定了导致过拟合的特征,并进一步使用新特征扩展了模型。新方法采用了具有氨基酸参数的进化和结构编码(EASE-AA)。用超过 600 个突变的独立测试集进行评估,EASE-AA 得到了 0.36 的马修斯相关系数,能够正确分类 66%的稳定突变体和 74%的不稳定突变体。对于真实值预测,EASE-AA 实现了预测和实验测量的稳定性变化之间的相关性为 0.51。
在训练集和测试集中随机划分同一蛋白质甚至同一残基的突变体进行评估的常用方法会导致预测性能的高估。因此,稳定性变化预测方法仅应在先前未见的非同源蛋白质的突变体上进行评估。在这种评估下,EASE-AA 比当前可用的方法更可靠地预测稳定性变化。