Suppr超能文献

评估噪声暴露时间趋势的方法。

Methods for evaluating temporal trends in noise exposure.

机构信息

* Department of Environmental Health Sciences and Risk Science Center, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , USA.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S76-83. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.857438.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hearing conservation programs have been mandatory in many US industries since 1983. Since then, three program elements (audiometric testing, hearing protection, and training) have been the focus of much research. By comparison, little has been done on noise exposure evaluation.

DESIGN

Temporal trends in time weighted average (TWA) exposures and the fraction of measurements exceeding 85 dBA were evaluated by facility, by exposure group within facility, and by individual worker within facility.

STUDY SAMPLE

A large dataset (> 10 000 measurements over 20 years) from eight facilities operated by a multinational aluminum manufacturing company was studied.

RESULTS

Overall, exposures declined across locations over the study period. Several facilities demonstrated substantial reductions in exposure, and the results of mean noise levels and exceedance fractions generally showed good agreement. The results of analyses at the individual level diverged with analyses by facility and exposure group within facility, suggesting that individual-level analyses, while challenging, may provide important information not available from coarser levels of analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Validated metrics are needed to allow for assessment of temporal trends in noise exposure. Such metrics will improve our ability to characterize, in a standardized manner, efforts to reduce noise-induced hearing loss.

摘要

目的

自 1983 年以来,许多美国行业都强制实行听力保护计划。自那时以来,三个计划要素(听力测试、听力保护和培训)一直是许多研究的重点。相比之下,对噪声暴露评估的研究却很少。

设计

通过设施、设施内的暴露组和设施内的每个工人,评估时间加权平均(TWA)暴露和超过 85 dBA 的测量值的分数的时间趋势。

研究样本

对一家跨国铝制造公司运营的 8 个设施的大型数据集(超过 20 年的超过 10000 次测量)进行了研究。

结果

总体而言,研究期间各地点的暴露量均有所下降。有几个设施的暴露量大幅减少,平均噪声水平和超标分数的结果通常非常吻合。个体层面分析的结果与设施和设施内暴露组的分析结果不一致,这表明虽然个体层面分析具有挑战性,但它可能提供从更粗糙的分析层面无法获得的重要信息。

结论

需要验证的指标来评估噪声暴露的时间趋势。这些指标将提高我们以标准化方式描述减少噪声性听力损失工作的能力。

相似文献

1
Methods for evaluating temporal trends in noise exposure.评估噪声暴露时间趋势的方法。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S76-83. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.857438.
6
Hearing conservation in the primary aluminium industry.原铝工业中的听力保护
Occup Med (Lond). 2016 Apr;66(3):208-14. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv168. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

5
British military hearing conservation programme.英国军队听力保护计划。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Jun;36(3):299-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02328.x.
6
Evaluation and comparison of three exposure assessment techniques.三种暴露评估技术的评估与比较。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 May;8(5):310-23. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.568832.
7
Improving exposure estimates by combining exposure information.通过整合暴露信息来改进暴露估计。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jun;55(5):537-47. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer011. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
10
Sex differences in injury patterns among workers in heavy manufacturing.重型制造业工人受伤模式的性别差异。
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jan 15;169(2):161-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn304. Epub 2008 Nov 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验