Suppr超能文献

1979 年至 2013 年 OSHA 职业噪声暴露测量的模式和趋势。

Patterns and trends in OSHA occupational noise exposure measurements from 1979 to 2013.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Cardno ChemRisk, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2019 Feb;76(2):118-124. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105041. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Noise is one of the most common exposures, and occupational noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is highly prevalent. In addition to NIHL, noise is linked to numerous non-auditory health effects. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) maintains the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) database of compliance-related measurements performed in various industries across the USA. The goal of the current study was to describe and analyse personal noise measurements available through the OSHA IMIS, identifying industries with elevated personal noise levels or increasing trends in worker exposure over time.

METHODS

Through a Freedom of Information Act request, we obtained OSHA's noise measurements collected and stored in IMIS between 1979 and 2013 and analysed permissible exposure limit (PEL) and action level (AL) criteria measurements by two-digit industry code.

RESULTS

The manufacturing industry represented 87.8% of the 93 920 PEL measurements and 84.6% of the 58 073 AL measurements. The highest mean noise levels were found among the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting industry for PEL (93.1 dBA) and the mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction group for AL (93.3 dBA). Overall, measurements generally showed a decreasing trend in noise levels and exceedances of AL and PEL by year, although this was not true for all industries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that, despite reductions in noise over time, further noise control interventions are warranted both inside and outside of the manufacturing industry. Further reductions in occupational noise exposures across many industries are necessary to continue to reduce the risk of occupational NIHL.

摘要

目的

噪声是最常见的暴露因素之一,职业性噪声聋(NIHL)的发病率很高。除了 NIHL 之外,噪声还与许多非听觉健康影响有关。职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)维护着美国各行业合规相关测量的综合管理信息系统(IMIS)数据库。本研究的目的是描述和分析 OSHA IMIS 中可获得的个人噪声测量结果,确定哪些行业的个人噪声水平较高,或者工人的暴露水平随时间呈上升趋势。

方法

通过信息自由法案的请求,我们获得了 OSHA 在 1979 年至 2013 年间收集并存储在 IMIS 中的噪声测量数据,并按两位数行业代码分析了允许接触限值(PEL)和行动水平(AL)标准测量值。

结果

制造业占 PEL(93.1 dBA)测量值的 87.8%和 AL(93.3 dBA)测量值的 84.6%。PEL 测量中,农业、林业、渔业和狩猎行业的平均噪声水平最高(93.1 dBA);而 AL 测量中,采矿业、采石业、石油和天然气开采业的噪声水平最高(93.3 dBA)。总体而言,尽管每年的噪声水平和 AL 及 PEL 超标情况都呈下降趋势,但并非所有行业都是如此。

结论

我们的结果表明,尽管噪声随时间有所降低,但仍需要在制造业内外采取进一步的噪声控制干预措施。为了继续降低职业性 NIHL 的风险,许多行业都需要进一步降低职业性噪声暴露。

相似文献

7
Occupational noise-induced hearing loss surveillance in Michigan.密歇根州职业性噪声所致听力损失监测
J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Aug;40(8):667-74. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199808000-00002.
8
Patrol Officer Daily Noise Exposure.巡警每日噪声暴露量。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(10):686-91. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1043051.

引用本文的文献

3
Surveillance of noise exposure levels in workplaces in Beijing.北京工作场所噪声暴露水平监测
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 29;13:1486497. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1486497. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

5
Methods for evaluating temporal trends in noise exposure.评估噪声暴露时间趋势的方法。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S76-83. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.857438.
8
P values and statistical practice.P值与统计实践。
Epidemiology. 2013 Jan;24(1):69-72. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31827886f7.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验