• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用计算机决策工具做出低碳电力组合的知情公众选择。

Informed public choices for low-carbon electricity portfolios using a computer decision tool.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Apr 1;48(7):3640-8. doi: 10.1021/es403473x. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1021/es403473x
PMID:24564708
Abstract

Reducing CO2 emissions from the electricity sector will likely require policies that encourage the widespread deployment of a diverse mix of low-carbon electricity generation technologies. Public discourse informs such policies. To make informed decisions and to productively engage in public discourse, citizens need to understand the trade-offs between electricity technologies proposed for widespread deployment. Building on previous paper-and-pencil studies, we developed a computer tool that aimed to help nonexperts make informed decisions about the challenges faced in achieving a low-carbon energy future. We report on an initial usability study of this interactive computer tool. After providing participants with comparative and balanced information about 10 electricity technologies, we asked them to design a low-carbon electricity portfolio. Participants used the interactive computer tool, which constrained portfolio designs to be realistic and yield low CO2 emissions. As they changed their portfolios, the tool updated information about projected CO2 emissions, electricity costs, and specific environmental impacts. As in the previous paper-and-pencil studies, most participants designed diverse portfolios that included energy efficiency, nuclear, coal with carbon capture and sequestration, natural gas, and wind. Our results suggest that participants understood the tool and used it consistently. The tool may be downloaded from http://cedmcenter.org/tools-for-cedm/informing-the-public-about-low-carbon-technologies/ .

摘要

减少电力部门的二氧化碳排放可能需要政策来鼓励广泛部署各种低碳发电技术。公众讨论为这些政策提供了信息。为了做出明智的决策并在公众讨论中进行富有成效的参与,公民需要了解广泛部署的电力技术之间的权衡。在之前的纸笔研究的基础上,我们开发了一种计算机工具,旨在帮助非专家就实现低碳能源未来所面临的挑战做出明智的决策。我们报告了对这个交互式计算机工具的初步可用性研究。在向参与者提供关于 10 种电力技术的比较和平衡信息后,我们要求他们设计一个低碳电力投资组合。参与者使用交互式计算机工具,该工具将投资组合设计限制为现实且产生低二氧化碳排放。随着他们改变投资组合,该工具会更新有关预计二氧化碳排放、电力成本和特定环境影响的信息。与之前的纸笔研究一样,大多数参与者设计了多样化的投资组合,其中包括能源效率、核能、碳捕获和封存的煤炭、天然气和风力发电。我们的研究结果表明,参与者理解了该工具并一致地使用了它。该工具可从 http://cedmcenter.org/tools-for-cedm/informing-the-public-about-low-carbon-technologies/ 下载。

相似文献

1
Informed public choices for low-carbon electricity portfolios using a computer decision tool.利用计算机决策工具做出低碳电力组合的知情公众选择。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Apr 1;48(7):3640-8. doi: 10.1021/es403473x. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
2
Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies.有碳捕集与封存(CCS)和其他低碳技术的电力组合的知情公众偏好。
Risk Anal. 2010 Sep;30(9):1399-410. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01436.x.
3
Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.发电:减少碳排放的选项
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1653-68. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1025.
4
Perspectives of Informed Citizen Panel on Low-Carbon Electricity Portfolios in Switzerland and Longer-Term Evaluation of Informational Materials.知情公民小组对瑞士低碳电力组合的看法及信息材料的更长期评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Oct 16;52(20):11478-11489. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01265. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
5
Optimizing the Chinese Electricity Mix for CO Emission Reduction: An Input-Output Linear Programming Model with Endogenous Capital.优化中国电力结构以减少 CO2 排放:一种具有内生资本的投入产出线性规划模型。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jan 21;54(2):697-706. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05199. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
6
SunShot solar power reduces costs and uncertainty in future low-carbon electricity systems.阳光太阳能降低了未来低碳电力系统的成本和不确定性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Aug 20;47(16):9053-60. doi: 10.1021/es401898f. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
7
Comparison of life cycle carbon dioxide emissions and embodied energy in four renewable electricity generation technologies in New Zealand.新西兰四种可再生发电技术的生命周期二氧化碳排放量与隐含能源比较。
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Aug 15;43(16):6406-13. doi: 10.1021/es900125e.
8
Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.重新评估燃煤电厂碳捕集的效率损失。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 20;49(20):12576-84. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03052. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
9
[Research on carbon reduction potential of electric vehicles for low-carbon transportation and its influencing factors].用于低碳交通的电动汽车碳减排潜力及其影响因素研究
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013 Jan;34(1):385-94.
10
Open Source Energy System Modeling Using Break-Even Costs to Inform State-Level Policy: A North Carolina Case Study.利用盈亏平衡成本进行开源能源系统建模以提供州级政策信息:北卡罗来纳州案例研究。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jan 21;54(2):665-676. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04184. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Visions for our future regional electricity system: Citizen preferences in four EU countries.我们未来区域电力系统的愿景:四个欧盟国家的公民偏好
iScience. 2024 Mar 12;27(4):109269. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109269. eCollection 2024 Apr 19.
2
How the public imagines the energy future: Exploring and clustering non-experts' techno-economic expectations towards the future energy system.公众如何想象能源未来:探索和聚类非专业人士对未来能源系统的技术经济期望。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 5;15(3):e0227369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227369. eCollection 2020.
3
Reflections on an interdisciplinary collaboration to inform public understanding of climate change, mitigation, and impacts.
关于气候变化、减缓措施和影响的公众理解的跨学科合作的思考。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7676-7683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803726115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
4
Developing citizen report cards for primary health care in low and middle-income countries: Results from cognitive interviews in rural Tajikistan.为低收入和中等收入国家的初级卫生保健制定公民报告卡:塔吉克斯坦农村认知访谈的结果
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 24;12(10):e0186745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186745. eCollection 2017.
5
Eliciting probabilistic expectations: Collaborations between psychologists and economists.引出概率期望:心理学家与经济学家之间的合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 28;114(13):3297-3304. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615461114. Epub 2017 Mar 7.