Institute for Innovation & Entrepreneurship, School of Management and Law, ZHAW, Winterthur, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich, Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), Transdisciplinarity Laboratory (TdLab), Zurich, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 5;15(3):e0227369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227369. eCollection 2020.
Various countries have pledged to carry out system-wide energy transitions to address climate change. This requires taking strategic decisions with long-term consequences under conditions of considerable uncertainty. For this reason, many actors in the energy sector develop model-based scenarios to guide debates and decision-making about plausible future energy systems. Besides being a decision support instrument for policy-makers, energy scenarios are widely recognized as a way of shaping the expectations of experts and of influencing energy policy more generally. However, relatively little is known about how energy scenarios shape preferences and expectations of the public. We use an explorative research design to assess the publics' expectations of future energy systems through an online survey among Swiss residents (N = 797). We identified four significantly different clusters of people with distinct expectations about the future energy system, each seeing different implications for the acceptability of energy policies and the compatibility with projections of techno-economic energy scenarios. Cluster 1 expects a system-wide energy transition towards renewable energy sources that is similar to the policy-relevant national energy scenario. Cluster 2 also expects an energy transition, but believes it will lead to a range of technical challenges, societal conflicts and controversies with neighboring countries. Cluster 3 is the only cluster not expecting significant changes in the future energy system and thus not anticipating an energy transition. Cluster 4's expectations are between cluster 1 and 2, but it anticipates a huge increase in per capita electricity demand while prices are expected to remain low. The study at hand offers some initial insights into the interdependencies between energy transition pathways outlined in techno-economic energy scenarios and the energy system expectations of the public. These insights are essential for gaining a better understanding of whether and how energy scenarios can contribute to informed public debates about energy futures and how desirable pathways towards them might look like.
各国已承诺进行全系统的能源转型,以应对气候变化。这需要在存在较大不确定性的情况下,根据长期后果做出战略性决策。出于这个原因,能源部门的许多参与者制定基于模型的情景,以指导关于未来可行能源系统的辩论和决策。除了作为决策者的决策支持工具外,能源情景还被广泛认为是塑造专家期望和更广泛地影响能源政策的一种方式。然而,人们对能源情景如何塑造公众的期望和预期知之甚少。我们使用探索性研究设计,通过对瑞士居民(N=797)的在线调查,评估公众对未来能源系统的期望。我们确定了四个具有不同未来能源系统期望的显著不同人群集群,每个集群都对能源政策的可接受性和与技术经济能源情景预测的兼容性有不同的看法。集群 1 期望向可再生能源的全系统能源转型,这与相关政策的国家能源情景相似。集群 2 也期望进行能源转型,但认为这将导致一系列技术挑战、社会冲突和与邻国的争议。集群 3 是唯一一个不期望未来能源系统发生重大变化的集群,因此不期望进行能源转型。集群 4 的期望介于集群 1 和 2 之间,但预计人均电力需求将大幅增加,而价格预计将保持低位。本研究初步探讨了技术经济能源情景中概述的能源转型途径与公众对能源系统的期望之间的相互依存关系。这些见解对于更好地理解能源情景是否以及如何有助于就能源未来进行知情的公众辩论以及它们可能看起来像什么样的可取途径至关重要。