• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对出院的未参保及医疗补助覆盖的糖尿病患者的过渡性护理诊所:一项试点质量改进研究。

Transitional care clinic for uninsured and medicaid-covered patients with diabetes mellitus discharged from the hospital: a pilot quality improvement study.

作者信息

Seggelke Stacey A, Hawkins R Mathew, Gibbs Joanna, Rasouli Neda, Wang Cecilia, Draznin Boris

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.

出版信息

Hosp Pract (1995). 2014 Feb;42(1):46-51. doi: 10.3810/hp.2014.02.1091.

DOI:10.3810/hp.2014.02.1091
PMID:24566596
Abstract

Transitioning from the inpatient to outpatient setting is often a problematic aspect of diabetes mellitus (DM) care. Different factors during hospitalization may adversely affect glycemic control in patients, who are frequently discharged on regimens that differ markedly from prehospitalization outpatient regimens. Moreover, the discharge recommendations may not have been tested adequately during a relatively short hospital length of stay and pose a significant threat to patient safety upon discharge. Our pilot study evaluated the effect on hospital utilization of the transitional care clinic (TCC), where patients with DM are seen within 2 to 5 days of hospital discharge. One hundred patients with DM, who were either medically indigent (no insurance or Medicaid and no primary care providers) or covered by Medicaid, and who did not have a primary care provider, were randomized into either a control or an intervention group upon discharge from the hospital. Subjects from the intervention group (n = 50) were seen in the TCC. All subjects were contacted 90 days after discharge to collect information about emergency department visits and readmissions. Thirteen subjects from the control group and 13 from the intervention group visited the emergency department within 90 days of discharge. Fourteen control subjects (28%) and 10 intervention patients (20%) were rehospitalized for various medical conditions during the follow-up period (P = not significant). Among patients originally admitted for DM-related issues, 6 of 14 in the control group (42.9%) and 2 out of 16 in the intervention group (12.5%) were readmitted during follow-up (P < 0.05). We conclude that the TCC may be effective for the prevention of rehospitalizations in indigent patients admitted for DM-related problems and who did not have primary care providers. The benefit of the TCC was not seen when patients with DM were admitted for other medical problems. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this preliminary finding.

摘要

从住院环境过渡到门诊环境通常是糖尿病(DM)护理中一个存在问题的方面。住院期间的不同因素可能会对患者的血糖控制产生不利影响,患者出院时所采用的治疗方案往往与住院前的门诊治疗方案有显著差异。此外,出院建议在相对较短的住院时间内可能没有得到充分检验,并且在出院时对患者安全构成重大威胁。我们的试点研究评估了过渡护理诊所(TCC)对医院利用率的影响,在该诊所,糖尿病患者在出院后2至5天内接受诊治。100名糖尿病患者,他们要么是医疗贫困者(没有保险或医疗补助且没有初级保健提供者),要么由医疗补助覆盖且没有初级保健提供者,在出院时被随机分为对照组或干预组。干预组的50名受试者在TCC接受诊治。所有受试者在出院90天后被联系,以收集有关急诊科就诊和再入院的信息。对照组的13名受试者和干预组的13名受试者在出院后90天内去过急诊科。在随访期间,14名对照组受试者(28%)和10名干预组患者(20%)因各种医疗状况再次住院(P值无统计学意义)。在最初因糖尿病相关问题入院的患者中,对照组14人中有6人(42.9%)在随访期间再次入院,干预组16人中有2人(12.5%)再次入院(P<0.05)。我们得出结论,TCC可能对预防因糖尿病相关问题入院且没有初级保健提供者的贫困患者再次住院有效。当糖尿病患者因其他医疗问题入院时,未观察到TCC的益处。需要更大规模的随机对照试验来证实这一初步发现。

相似文献

1
Transitional care clinic for uninsured and medicaid-covered patients with diabetes mellitus discharged from the hospital: a pilot quality improvement study.针对出院的未参保及医疗补助覆盖的糖尿病患者的过渡性护理诊所:一项试点质量改进研究。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2014 Feb;42(1):46-51. doi: 10.3810/hp.2014.02.1091.
2
Influence of a transitional care clinic on subsequent 30-day hospitalizations and emergency department visits in individuals discharged from a skilled nursing facility.从护理院出院的患者接受过渡护理诊所治疗对随后 30 天内的住院和急诊就诊的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jan;61(1):137-42. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12051. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
3
Managed care for uninsured adults: the rise and fall of a university-based program.为未参保成年人提供的管理式医疗服务:一个基于大学的项目的兴衰
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Jul;8(7):653-61.
4
Planning and designing the care transitions innovation (C-Train) for uninsured and Medicaid patients.规划和设计针对无保险和医疗补助患者的护理转接创新(C-Train)。
J Hosp Med. 2012 Sep;7(7):524-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1926. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
5
Preventing readmissions through comprehensive discharge planning.通过全面的出院计划预防再入院。
Prof Case Manag. 2013 Mar-Apr;18(2):56-63; quiz 64-5. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e31827de1ce.
6
Does having an outpatient visit after hospital discharge reduce the likelihood of readmission?出院后进行门诊复诊是否会降低再次入院的可能性?
Del Med J. 2003 Aug;75(8):291-8.
7
Effects of an enhanced discharge planning intervention for hospitalized older adults: a randomized trial.增强型出院计划干预对住院老年患者的影响:一项随机试验。
Gerontologist. 2013 Jun;53(3):430-40. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns109. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
8
Timeliness of outpatient follow-up: an evidence-based approach for planning after hospital discharge.门诊随访的及时性:一种基于证据的出院后规划方法。
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Mar;13(2):115-22. doi: 10.1370/afm.1753.
9
Uncompleted emergency department care: patients who leave against medical advice.急诊科未完成的护理:自行出院的患者。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):870-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.027. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
10
Reduction of 30-day postdischarge hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates in high-risk elderly medical patients through delivery of a targeted care bundle.通过提供针对性的护理包,降低高危老年内科患者出院后30天内的医院再入院率或急诊科就诊率。
J Hosp Med. 2009 Apr;4(4):211-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.427.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacist-Led Discharge Transitions of Care Interventions for Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review.药师主导的儿科患者出院护理过渡干预措施:一项叙述性综述
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2023;28(3):180-191. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.3.180. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
2
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
3
Hospital Readmission Risk and Risk Factors of People with a Primary or Secondary Discharge Diagnosis of Diabetes.
原发性或继发性出院诊断为糖尿病患者的医院再入院风险及风险因素
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 6;12(4):1274. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041274.
4
Predicting and Preventing Acute Care Re-Utilization by Patients with Diabetes.预测和预防糖尿病患者急性护理再利用。
Curr Diab Rep. 2021 Sep 4;21(9):34. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01402-7.
5
The Association Between Insulin Initiation and Adverse Outcomes After Hospital Discharge in Older Adults: a Population-Based Cohort Study.老年人出院后胰岛素起始与不良结局的关系:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Apr;34(4):575-582. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04849-3. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
6
Strategies to Prevent Readmission in High-Risk Patients with Diabetes: the Importance of an Interdisciplinary Approach.预防高危糖尿病患者再入院的策略:跨学科方法的重要性。
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Jun 21;18(8):54. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1027-z.
7
Predischarge and Postdischarge Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission Among Patients With Diabetes.糖尿病患者出院前和出院后再入院的风险因素。
Med Care. 2018 Jul;56(7):634-642. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000931.
8
Correction to: Hospital Readmission of Patients with Diabetes.《糖尿病患者再次入院》勘误
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Mar 13;18(4):21. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-0989-1.
9
Practical Recommendations for Transitioning Patients with Type 2 Diabetes from Hospital to Home.2型糖尿病患者从医院过渡到家庭的实用建议
Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Jul;17(7):52. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0876-1.
10
The Case for Diabetes Population Health Improvement: Evidence-Based Programming for Population Outcomes in Diabetes.改善糖尿病群体健康的理由:基于证据的糖尿病群体结局规划。
Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Jul;17(7):51. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0875-2.