Suppr超能文献

健康信息技术可用性评估量表的构建和预测有效性研究:验证性因子分析和结构方程建模结果。

Examining construct and predictive validity of the Health-IT Usability Evaluation Scale: confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling results.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct;21(e2):e241-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001811. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, we developed the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES), which is designed to support customization at the item level. Such customization matches the specific tasks/expectations of a health IT system while retaining comparability at the construct level, and provides evidence of its factorial validity and internal consistency reliability through exploratory factor analysis.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we advanced the development of Health-ITUES to examine its construct validity and predictive validity.

METHODS

The health IT system studied was a web-based communication system that supported nurse staffing and scheduling. Using Health-ITUES, we conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate users' perception toward the web-based communication system after system implementation. We examined Health-ITUES's construct validity through first and second order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and its predictive validity via structural equation modeling (SEM).

RESULTS

The sample comprised 541 staff nurses in two healthcare organizations. The CFA (n=165) showed that a general usability factor accounted for 78.1%, 93.4%, 51.0%, and 39.9% of the explained variance in 'Quality of Work Life', 'Perceived Usefulness', 'Perceived Ease of Use', and 'User Control', respectively. The SEM (n=541) supported the predictive validity of Health-ITUES, explaining 64% of the variance in intention for system use.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of CFA and SEM provide additional evidence for the construct and predictive validity of Health-ITUES. The customizability of Health-ITUES has the potential to support comparisons at the construct level, while allowing variation at the item level. We also illustrate application of Health-ITUES across stages of system development.

摘要

背景

在之前的研究中,我们开发了健康信息技术可用性评估量表(Health-ITUES),旨在支持项目级别的定制。这种定制在保留结构级别可比性的同时,匹配特定健康信息技术系统的特定任务/期望,并通过探索性因素分析提供其因子有效性和内部一致性可靠性的证据。

目的

本研究进一步开发了 Health-ITUES,以检验其结构有效性和预测有效性。

方法

研究的健康信息技术系统是一个支持护士人员配置和排班的基于网络的通信系统。使用 Health-ITUES,我们进行了一项横断面研究,以评估系统实施后用户对基于网络的通信系统的感知。我们通过一阶和二阶验证性因素分析(CFA)检验 Health-ITUES 的结构有效性,并通过结构方程建模(SEM)检验其预测有效性。

结果

样本包括两个医疗机构的 541 名注册护士。CFA(n=165)表明,一个通用可用性因子分别解释了工作生活质量、感知有用性、感知易用性和用户控制的 78.1%、93.4%、51.0%和 39.9%的方差。SEM(n=541)支持 Health-ITUES 的预测有效性,解释了系统使用意图的 64%的方差。

结论

CFA 和 SEM 的结果为 Health-ITUES 的结构和预测有效性提供了额外的证据。Health-ITUES 的可定制性有可能支持结构水平的比较,同时允许项目水平的变化。我们还说明了 Health-ITUES 在系统开发的各个阶段的应用。

相似文献

2
Development of a Customizable Health IT Usability Evaluation Scale.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:917-21.
3
Establishing a usability cut-point for the health information technology usability evaluation scale (Health-ITUES).
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104713. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104713. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
7
Users' acceptance of electronic patient portals in Lebanon.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 17;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1047-x.
9
An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry.
Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):324-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.06.006. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A Usability Survey of a Quality Improvement Data Visualization Tool Among Medical Intensive Care Unit Nurses.
ACI open. 2024 Jan;8(1):e33-e42. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782604. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
3
Factors influencing Chinese doctors to use medical large language models.
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 8;10:20552076241297237. doi: 10.1177/20552076241297237. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Quality of interaction between clinicians and artificial intelligence systems. A systematic review.
Future Healthc J. 2024 Aug 17;11(3):100172. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100172. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Human-Centered Design and Development of a Fall Prevention Exercise App for Older Adults in Primary Care Settings.
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 May;15(3):544-555. doi: 10.1055/a-2267-1727. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
10
Inpatient nurses' preferences and decisions with risk information visualization.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):61-69. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad209.

本文引用的文献

2
User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):711-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000281. Epub 2011 May 27.
3
Development of a Customizable Health IT Usability Evaluation Scale.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:917-21.
4
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.
Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
5
Human factors in patient safety as an innovation.
Appl Ergon. 2010 Sep;41(5):657-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
7
The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care.
J Biomed Inform. 2010 Feb;43(1):159-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
9
Health information systems adoption: findings from a systematic review.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):262-6.
10
Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:31-65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验