Spandonaro Federico, Ayala Fabio, Berardesca Enzo, Chimenti Sergio, Girolomoni Giampiero, Martini Patrizia, Peserico Andrea, Polistena Barbara, Puglisi Guerra Antonio, Vena Gino Antonio, Altomare Gianfranco, Calzavara Pinton Piergiacomo
University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Columbia 2, 00133, Rome, Italy,
BioDrugs. 2014 Jun;28(3):285-95. doi: 10.1007/s40259-014-0084-3.
Biologic therapies are considered to be cost effective by leading Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies and, therefore, eligible for reimbursement by public health services. However, biologic therapies entail sizable incremental costs and, besides, have a considerable financial impact that in Italy amounts to 13.7 % of the national health service's pharmaceutical expenditure. In the reimbursability decision process, an important role is played by both the drug efficacy data observed in pre-licensing RCTs and the economic modelling assumptions, as they give evidence on cost effectiveness. The administration of therapies in real practice settings is likely to produce a significant deviation from the results predicted by the models, theoretically outweighing the assumption on which the decision process is founded. This is a matter of concern for public health services and, consequently, an interesting topic to investigate.
To overcome the lack of knowledge concerning the actual cost effectiveness of biologic therapies for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in the clinical practice setting in Italy, an observational study was conducted in 12 specialist centres on patients switching to biologic therapy within a 6-month enrolment window.
The study confirms in clinical practice the efficacy of the switch to biologic therapies, analysed using a number of clinical [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and itching VAS] and quality-of-life parameters. A general health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) improvement, with a 0.23 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) mean gain per patient, has been reported in the 6-month observation period. The direct medical costs to treat plaque psoriasis with biologic therapies amount to
At least in the short-term, the clinical practice of the specialised Italian centres taking part in the study confirms that switching patients to a biologic drug produces an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparable with the values predicted by the HTA bodies.
领先的卫生技术评估(HTA)机构认为生物疗法具有成本效益,因此有资格获得公共卫生服务的报销。然而,生物疗法带来了相当大的增量成本,此外,还产生了相当大的财务影响,在意大利这一影响相当于国家卫生服务药品支出的13.7%。在报销资格决定过程中,许可前随机对照试验(RCT)中观察到的药物疗效数据和经济模型假设都发挥着重要作用,因为它们提供了成本效益的证据。在实际临床环境中进行治疗可能会导致与模型预测结果产生重大偏差,理论上这会超过决策过程所依据的假设。这是公共卫生服务关注的问题,因此是一个值得研究的有趣课题。
为了克服意大利临床实践中关于生物疗法治疗斑块状银屑病实际成本效益方面知识的不足,在12个专科中心对6个月入组期内开始使用生物疗法的患者进行了一项观察性研究。
该研究在临床实践中证实了改用生物疗法的疗效,使用了一些临床指标[银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和瘙痒VAS]以及生活质量参数进行分析。在6个月的观察期内,报告显示总体健康相关生活质量(HR-QOL)有所改善,每位患者平均获得0.23个质量调整生命年(QALY)。用生物疗法治疗斑块状银屑病的直接医疗费用每年低于15,073.7欧元(入组前,这些患者每年花费2,166.2欧元)。改用生物制剂后,治疗第一年每获得一个QALY的成本为28,656.3欧元。
至少在短期内,参与该研究的意大利专科中心的临床实践证实,将患者改用生物药物产生的增量成本效益比与HTA机构预测的值相当。