• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种生物活性粘结水门汀的物理性能及比较强度

Physical properties and comparative strength of a bioactive luting cement.

作者信息

Jefferies Steven, Lööf Jesper, Pameijer Cornelis H, Boston Daniel, Galbraith Colin, Hermansson Leif

机构信息

Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Director of Research, Doxa Dental AB, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;34 Spec No 8:8-14.

PMID:24568170
Abstract

UNLABELLED

New dental cement formulations require testing to determine physical and mechanical laboratory properties.

OBJECTIVES

To test an experimental calcium aluminate/glass-ionomer cement, Ceramir C and B (CC and B), regarding compressive strength (CS), film thickness (FT), net setting time (ST) and Vickers hardness. An additional test to evaluate potential dimensional change/expansion properties of this cement was also conducted.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

CS was measured according to a slightly modified ISO 9917:2003 for the CC and B specimens. The samples were not clamped while being exposed to relative humidity of great than 90 percent at 37 degrees C for 10 minutes before being stored in phosphate-buffered saline at 37 degrees C. For the CS, four groups were tested: Group 1-CC and B; Group 2-RelyX Luting Cement; Group 3-Fuji Plus; and Group 4-RelyX Unicem. Samples from all groups were stored for 24 hours before testing. Only CCandB was tested for ST and FT according to ISO 9917:2003. The FT was tested 2 minutes after mixing. Vickers hardness was evaluated using the CSM Microhardness Indentation Tester using zinc phosphate cement as a comparison material. Expansion testing included evaluating potential cracks in feldspathic porcelain jacket crowns (PJCs).

RESULTS

The mean and standard deviation after 24 hours were expressed in MPa: Group 1 equals 160 plus or equal to 27; Group 2 equals 96 plus or equal to 10; Group 3 equals 138 plus or equal to 15; Group 4 equals 157 plus or equal to 10. A single-factor ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant differences between the groups (P less than 0.001). Pair-wise statistical comparison demonstrated a statistically significant difference between Groups 1 and 2. No statistically significant differences were found between other groups. The FT was 16.8 plus or equal to 0.9 and the ST was 4.8 plus or equal to 0.1 min. Vickers hardness for Ceramir C and B was 68.3 plus or equal to 17.2 and was statistically significantly higher (P less than 0.05) than Fleck's Zinc Phosphate cement at Vickers hardness of 51.4 plus or equal to 10. There was no evidence of cracks due to radial expansion in PJCs by the Ceramir C and B cement.

CONCLUSION

All luting cements tested demonstrated compressive strengths well in excess of the ISO requirement for water-based cements of no less than 50 MPa. Ceramir C and B showed significantly higher CS than RelyX Luting Cement after 24 hours, but was not significantly higher than either Fuji Plus or RelyX Unicem. The ST and FT values of CC and B conform to and are within the boundaries of the requirements of the standard. Surface hardness was statistically higher than and comparable to zinc phosphate cement. There was no evidence of potentially clinically significant and deleterious expansion behavior by this cement. All cements tested demonstrated acceptable strength properties. Within the limits of this study, Ceramir C and B is deemed to possess physical properties suitable for a dental luting cement.

摘要

未标注

新型牙科水门汀配方需要进行测试以确定其物理和力学实验室性能。

目的

测试一种实验性铝酸钙/玻璃离子水门汀Ceramir C和B(CC和B)的抗压强度(CS)、薄膜厚度(FT)、净凝固时间(ST)和维氏硬度。还进行了一项额外测试以评估该水门汀的潜在尺寸变化/膨胀性能。

方法和材料

根据对ISO 9917:2003稍作修改的方法测量CC和B样本的CS。样本在37℃下暴露于相对湿度大于90%的环境中10分钟且不夹紧,然后储存在37℃的磷酸盐缓冲盐水中。对于CS测试,分为四组:第1组 - CC和B;第2组 - RelyX Luting水门汀;第3组 - Fuji Plus;第4组 - RelyX Unicem。所有组的样本在测试前储存24小时。仅根据ISO 9917:2003对CC和B进行ST和FT测试。混合后2分钟测试FT。使用CSM显微硬度压痕测试仪评估维氏硬度,并以磷酸锌水门汀作为对比材料。膨胀测试包括评估长石质烤瓷全冠(PJC)中潜在的裂纹。

结果

24小时后的平均值和标准差以MPa表示:第1组等于160±27;第2组等于96±10;第3组等于138±15;第4组等于157±10。单因素方差分析显示各组之间存在统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。两两统计比较显示第1组和第2组之间存在统计学显著差异。其他组之间未发现统计学显著差异。FT为16.8±0.9,ST为4.8±0.1分钟。Ceramir C和B的维氏硬度为68.3±17.2,在维氏硬度为51.4±10时,与Fleck磷酸锌水门汀相比具有统计学显著更高(P<0.05)。没有证据表明Ceramir C和B水门汀会导致PJC因径向膨胀出现裂纹。

结论

所有测试的粘结水门汀显示出的抗压强度远超过ISO对水性水门汀不低于50 MPa 的要求。24小时后Ceramir C和B显示出比RelyX Luting水门汀显著更高的CS,但不比Fuji Plus或RelyX Unicem显著更高。CC和B的ST和FT值符合标准要求且在其范围内。表面硬度在统计学上高于磷酸锌水门汀且与之相当。没有证据表明该水门汀存在潜在的临床显著且有害的膨胀行为。所有测试的水门汀显示出可接受的强度性能。在本研究的范围内,Ceramir C和B被认为具有适合牙科粘结水门汀的物理性能。

相似文献

1
Physical properties and comparative strength of a bioactive luting cement.一种生物活性粘结水门汀的物理性能及比较强度
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;34 Spec No 8:8-14.
2
Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.各种黏固剂对牙本质的修复材料黏结。
Oper Dent. 2011 May-Jun;36(3):266-73. doi: 10.2341/10-236-L. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
3
Mechanical properties of luting cements after water storage.储水后粘接水门汀的力学性能。
Oper Dent. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):535-42.
4
In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.使用不同粘结剂的氧化锆陶瓷冠的体外固位强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011.
5
Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.使用氧化锌/丁香酚封闭剂进行根管充填后,五种粘结水门汀对预制桩钉的固位强度:1. 充填后一周进行桩钉预备/粘结。
J Prosthodont. 2002 Sep;11(3):168-75.
6
In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates.三种自粘接树脂水门汀和一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀与各种义齿基托材料的体外剪切粘结强度。
Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):186-96. doi: 10.2341/11-317-L. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
7
Effect of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement Dispensing/Mixing Methods on Mechanical Properties.树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀调配/混合方法对力学性能的影响
Oper Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;43(4):E158-E165. doi: 10.2341/17-166-L. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
A bioactive dental luting cement--its retentive properties and 3-year clinical findings.一种生物活性牙科粘结水门汀——其固位性能及3年临床研究结果
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Feb;34 Spec No 1:2-9.
9
Sealing properties of a calcium aluminate luting agent.铝酸钙粘结剂的密封性能。
Am J Dent. 2010 Apr;23(2):121-4.
10
Mechanical property characterization of a novel directly-placed ceramic restorative material.一种新型直接放置陶瓷修复材料的力学性能表征
Am J Dent. 2004 Dec;17(6):417-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Experimental and Finite Element Analysis of Compressive Strength and Diametral Tensile Strength of Luting Cement: An In Vitro Study.粘结水门汀抗压强度和径向拉伸强度的实验与有限元分析:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):e64658. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64658. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Effect of Storage Temperature on Selected Strength Parameters of Dual-Cured Composite Cements.储存温度对双固化复合水门汀选定强度参数的影响
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Sep 22;14(10):487. doi: 10.3390/jfb14100487.
3
Update on Dental Luting Materials.牙科粘结材料的最新进展
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;10(11):208. doi: 10.3390/dj10110208.