• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粘结水门汀抗压强度和径向拉伸强度的实验与有限元分析：一项体外研究

Experimental and Finite Element Analysis of Compressive Strength and Diametral Tensile Strength of Luting Cement: An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Saleem Sazan S, Sabir Sazgar M, Abdulla Kareem A

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics, Orthodontics, and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry of Hawler Medical University, Erbil, IRQ.

Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics, College of Engineering, Salahaddin University Erbil, Erbil, IRQ.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):e64658. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64658. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.64658
PMID:39149653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11326503/
Abstract

Background Strength parameters greatly influence the selection of luting agents. This study compared the compressive and diametral tensile strengths (DTS) of three luting cements. Materials and methods Three luting cements, conventional glass ionomer (CGI), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI), and resin cement (RC), were tested for compressive strength and DTS. Forty-two standardized specimens were prepared, measuring 4 mm by 6 mm for compressive tests and 6 mm by 3 mm for diametral tensile tests. The luting materials were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions. Result Experimental mean compressive and diametral strengths and standard errors were calculated for each luting agent (n = 10). Analysis of variance was computed (p < 0.05), and multiple comparison tests were performed. RC showed significantly higher compressive strengths and DTS among the three tested luting cements, while the CGI showed the least. The results obtained by finite element analysis (FEA) for both tests closely matched the experimental results. Conclusion In this study, it was concluded that the mean compressive strength and DTS values of all three luting cements were significantly different. The resin luting cement exhibited the highest compressive strength and DTS, while the CGI exhibited the least.

摘要

背景 强度参数对粘结剂的选择有很大影响。本研究比较了三种粘结水门汀的抗压强度和径向拉伸强度（DTS）。材料与方法 对三种粘结水门汀，即传统玻璃离子水门汀（CGI）、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀（RMGI）和树脂水门汀（RC）进行抗压强度和DTS测试。制备了42个标准化试件，抗压试验用试件尺寸为4mm×6mm，径向拉伸试验用试件尺寸为6mm×3mm。粘结材料按照制造商的说明进行制备。结果 计算了每种粘结剂的实验平均抗压强度和径向拉伸强度以及标准误差（n = 10）。进行方差分析（p < 0.05）并进行多重比较试验。在三种测试的粘结水门汀中，RC的抗压强度和DTS显著更高，而CGI最低。有限元分析（FEA）对两项试验获得的结果与实验结果密切匹配。结论 在本研究中，得出的结论是，所有三种粘结水门汀的平均抗压强度和DTS值均有显著差异。树脂粘结水门汀的抗压强度和DTS最高，而CGI最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/1b98b38bec6a/cureus-0016-00000064658-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/a5435628beab/cureus-0016-00000064658-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/2cb411b36aef/cureus-0016-00000064658-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/d890779109c6/cureus-0016-00000064658-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/31cad1201426/cureus-0016-00000064658-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/8d0f4a580126/cureus-0016-00000064658-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/4459ead6ac2a/cureus-0016-00000064658-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/48808c693a5c/cureus-0016-00000064658-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/dbb9be45bcbe/cureus-0016-00000064658-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/ea096ecdf9b6/cureus-0016-00000064658-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/a4d6fc36941c/cureus-0016-00000064658-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/1b98b38bec6a/cureus-0016-00000064658-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/a5435628beab/cureus-0016-00000064658-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/2cb411b36aef/cureus-0016-00000064658-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/d890779109c6/cureus-0016-00000064658-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/31cad1201426/cureus-0016-00000064658-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/8d0f4a580126/cureus-0016-00000064658-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/4459ead6ac2a/cureus-0016-00000064658-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/48808c693a5c/cureus-0016-00000064658-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/dbb9be45bcbe/cureus-0016-00000064658-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/ea096ecdf9b6/cureus-0016-00000064658-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/a4d6fc36941c/cureus-0016-00000064658-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe73/11326503/1b98b38bec6a/cureus-0016-00000064658-i11.jpg

相似文献

1
Experimental and Finite Element Analysis of Compressive Strength and Diametral Tensile Strength of Luting Cement: An In Vitro Study.粘结水门汀抗压强度和径向拉伸强度的实验与有限元分析：一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):e64658. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64658. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Compressive and diametral tensile strengths of current adhesive luting agents.当前粘结性粘固剂的抗压强度和径向拉伸强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jun;69(6):568-72. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90283-t.
3
The effect of temperature on compressive and tensile strengths of commonly used luting cements: an in vitro study.温度对常用粘结水门汀抗压强度和抗拉强度的影响：一项体外研究。
J Int Oral Health. 2015 Feb;7(2):13-9.
4
Effect of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement Dispensing/Mixing Methods on Mechanical Properties.树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀调配/混合方法对力学性能的影响
Oper Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;43(4):E158-E165. doi: 10.2341/17-166-L. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Diametral Tensile Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and a Glass Hybrid Glass Ionomer Cement.传统玻璃离子水门汀与玻璃混合玻璃离子水门汀抗压强度和径向拉伸强度的比较评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jul-Aug;15(4):398-401. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2407.
6
Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.玻璃离子水门汀、复合体和树脂复合材料的实验室强度。
J Prosthodont. 2002 Jun;11(2):86-91.
7
Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials.牙科核心材料的直径和抗压强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Sep;82(3):272-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70079-x.
8
Mechanical properties of dental luting cements.牙科粘结水门汀的力学性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 May;81(5):597-609. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70216-7.
9
Modification of conventional glass-ionomer cements with N-vinylpyrrolidone containing polyacids, nano-hydroxy and fluoroapatite to improve mechanical properties.用含N-乙烯基吡咯烷酮的多元酸、纳米羟基和氟磷灰石对传统玻璃离子水门汀进行改性以改善机械性能。
Dent Mater. 2008 Oct;24(10):1381-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
10
Diametral tensile strength and water sorption of glass-ionomer cements used in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment.用于非创伤性修复治疗的玻璃离子水门汀的直径拉伸强度和吸水率。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2003 Jun;11(2):96-101. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572003000200003.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of compressive and adhesive strengths of a hybrid ceramic and 5Y-PSZ zirconia cemented with three different materials.评估用三种不同材料粘结的混合陶瓷和5Y-PSZ氧化锆的抗压强度和粘结强度。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2025 Aug;133(4):e70017. doi: 10.1111/eos.70017. Epub 2025 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Dental Resin-Based Luting Materials-Review.基于树脂的牙科粘接材料——综述
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Oct 19;15(20):4156. doi: 10.3390/polym15204156.
2
Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review.牙科水门汀：最新全面综述。
Molecules. 2023 Feb 8;28(4):1619. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041619.
3
Biomechanical Modelling for Tooth Survival Studies: Mechanical Properties, Loads and Boundary Conditions-A Narrative Review.牙齿存活研究的生物力学建模：力学性能、载荷与边界条件——一篇叙述性综述
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;15(21):7852. doi: 10.3390/ma15217852.
4
Update on Dental Luting Materials.牙科粘结材料的最新进展
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;10(11):208. doi: 10.3390/dj10110208.
5
Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Three Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Materials.三种树脂改性玻璃离子材料机械性能的评估。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 2;2022:4690656. doi: 10.1155/2022/4690656. eCollection 2022.
6
Effect on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Conventional Glass Ionomer Luting Cements by Incorporation of All-Ceramic Additives: An In Vitro Study.全陶瓷添加剂对传统玻璃离子水门汀物理和力学性能的影响：一项体外研究。
Int J Dent. 2020 Sep 30;2020:8896225. doi: 10.1155/2020/8896225. eCollection 2020.
7
Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Sorption/Solubility of Four Luting Cements.四种粘结水门汀抗压强度及吸附/溶解性的评估
J Dent Biomater. 2017 Jun;4(2):387-393.
8
A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry.玻璃离子水门汀在临床牙科中的应用综述。
J Funct Biomater. 2016 Jun 28;7(3):16. doi: 10.3390/jfb7030016.
9
A comparison study on the flexural strength and compressive strength of four resin-modified luting glass ionomer cements.四种树脂改性粘结玻璃离子水门汀的抗折强度和抗压强度的比较研究。
Biomed Mater Eng. 2015;26 Suppl 1:S9-17. doi: 10.3233/BME-151284.
10
The effect of temperature on compressive and tensile strengths of commonly used luting cements: an in vitro study.温度对常用粘结水门汀抗压强度和抗拉强度的影响：一项体外研究。
J Int Oral Health. 2015 Feb;7(2):13-9.