AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Breast Disease Unit, University Paris Diderot, Paris 75475, France.
AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Biostatistic Department, Paris 75475, France.
Br J Cancer. 2014 Mar 18;110(6):1413-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.81. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
Triple-negative (TN) breast cancers exhibit major initial responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but generally have a poor outcome. Because of the lack of validated drug targets, chemotherapy remains an important therapeutic tool in these cancers.
We report the survival of two consecutive series of 267 locally advanced breast cancers (LABC) treated with two different neoadjuvant regimens, either a dose-dense and dose-intense cyclophosphamide-anthracycline (AC) association (historically called SIM) or a conventional sequential association of cyclophosphamide and anthracycline, followed by taxanes (EC-T). We compared pathological responses and survival rates of these two groups and studied their association with tumours features.
Although the two regimens showed equivalent pathological complete response (pCR) in the whole population (16 and 12%), the SIM regimen yielded a non-statistically higher pCR rate than EC-T (48% vs 24%, P=0.087) in TN tumours. In the SIM protocol, DFS was statistically higher for TN than for non-TN patients (P=0.019), although we showed that the TN status was associated with an increased initial risk of recurrence in both regimens. This effect gradually decreased and after 2 years, TN was associated with a significantly decreased likelihood of relapse in SIM-treated LABC (hazard ratio (HR)=0.25 (95% CI: 0.07-0.86), P=0.028).
AC dose intensification treatment is associated with a very favourable long-term survival rate in TN breast cancers. These observations call for a prospective assessment of such dose-intense AC-based regimens in locally advanced TN tumours.
三阴性(TN)乳腺癌在新辅助化疗中表现出主要的初始反应,但总体预后较差。由于缺乏经过验证的药物靶点,化疗仍然是这些癌症的重要治疗手段。
我们报告了连续两批 267 例局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)患者的生存情况,这些患者接受了两种不同的新辅助方案治疗,一种是剂量密集和剂量强化的环磷酰胺-蒽环类药物(AC)联合方案(历史上称为 SIM),另一种是环磷酰胺和蒽环类药物的传统序贯联合方案,然后是紫杉类药物(EC-T)。我们比较了这两组的病理反应和生存率,并研究了它们与肿瘤特征的关系。
尽管两种方案在整个人群中显示出等效的病理完全缓解(pCR)(16%和 12%),但在 TN 肿瘤中,SIM 方案的 pCR 率非统计学上高于 EC-T(48%比 24%,P=0.087)。在 SIM 方案中,TN 患者的DFS 统计学上高于非 TN 患者(P=0.019),尽管我们表明 TN 状态与两种方案中复发风险的增加有关。这种影响逐渐减弱,两年后,在 SIM 治疗的 LABC 中,TN 与复发的可能性显著降低相关(风险比(HR)=0.25(95%CI:0.07-0.86),P=0.028)。
AC 剂量强化治疗与 TN 乳腺癌的非常有利的长期生存率相关。这些观察结果呼吁对局部晚期 TN 肿瘤中基于这种剂量强化 AC 的方案进行前瞻性评估。