Royse C F, Williams Z, Ye G, Wilkinson D, De Steiger R, Richardson M, Newman S
Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Jul;58(6):660-7. doi: 10.1111/aas.12273. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
Initial validation and feasibility for the Post-operative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) was published in 2010. Ongoing validation includes studies to determine whether this scale can discriminate differences in recovery between cohorts.
A prospective cohort study included 61 patients, 18-40 years, and 61 patients, aged ≥ 65 years, undergoing knee arthroscopy under general anaesthesia; and 13 patients, aged ≥ 65 years, undergoing total knee replacement under general anaesthesia. Patients were assessed using the PQRS. Assessments were performed pre-surgery, at 15 and 40 min, 1 and 3 days, and 3 months after surgery.
The effect of age was assessed by comparing young versus older arthroscopy patients. There were minimal differences in recovery profiles, other than for the nociceptive domain, where pain recovery was significantly better in the older arthroscopy patients (P < 0.001). The effect of surgery was assessed by comparing older patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with knee replacement patients. Recovery was significantly worse for the knee replacement group for cognition (P = 0.015), nociception (pain and nausea, P < 0.001), activities of daily living (P < 0.001), emotive recovery (P = 0.029), and all-domains recovery (P < 0.001). Despite differences in quality of recovery, satisfaction was high in all cohorts.
Knee replacement had a large effect on recovery compared with knee arthroscopy. Age had minimal effect on recovery after knee arthroscopy. The study showed the ability of the PQRS to discriminate recovery in different domains.
术后恢复质量量表(PQRS)于2010年发表了初步验证和可行性研究。正在进行的验证包括确定该量表能否区分不同队列之间恢复差异的研究。
一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了61名年龄在18至40岁之间的患者以及61名年龄≥65岁的患者,他们均在全身麻醉下接受膝关节镜检查;还有13名年龄≥65岁的患者,在全身麻醉下接受全膝关节置换术。使用PQRS对患者进行评估。评估在手术前、术后15分钟和40分钟、1天和3天以及3个月时进行。
通过比较年轻与年长的关节镜检查患者来评估年龄的影响。除伤害感受域外,恢复情况差异极小,在该域中,年长的关节镜检查患者疼痛恢复明显更好(P < 0.001)。通过比较接受膝关节镜检查的老年患者与膝关节置换患者来评估手术的影响。膝关节置换组在认知(P = 0.015)、伤害感受(疼痛和恶心,P < 0.001)、日常生活活动(P < 0.001)、情绪恢复(P = 0.029)和所有领域恢复(P < 0.001)方面的恢复明显更差。尽管恢复质量存在差异,但所有队列的满意度都很高。
与膝关节镜检查相比,膝关节置换对恢复有很大影响。年龄对膝关节镜检查后的恢复影响极小。该研究表明PQRS能够区分不同领域的恢复情况。