Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Int Dent J. 2014 Mar;64 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):29-34. doi: 10.1111/idj.12100.
To assess the potential of a stabilised stannous (Sn)-containing NaF dentifrice (Oral B/blend-a-Med(®) Pro-Expert), in addition to a number of other marketed European dentifrices formulated with various fluoride actives and two control dentifrices, to protect enamel against erosive acid damage.
Cores of human enamel (four per group) were soaked in pooled human saliva, and then treated with a 1:3 slurry (dentifrice:saliva) using a standardised in vitro erosion model (5-day cycling) that includes 10-minute challenges with 1% citric acid applied 60 minutes after each dentifrice treatment. Enamel surface loss was measured using transverse microradiography (TMR).
Specimens treated with the Sn-containing NaF dentifrice showed 6.5 μm of surface loss ± 1.2 (SEM), which was not significantly different (P < 0.05, Fisher LSD) from that of a clinically proven, stabilised SnF2 positive control [Crest(®) Pro-Health, 1,100 ppm F as SnF2 : 3.0 μm of surface loss ± 1.1 (SEM)]. The Sn-containing NaF dentifrice and the clinically proven positive control both provided significantly greater protection (P < 0.05, Fisher LSD) compared with all of the other products tested. Enamel loss (SEM) values for other European products and the reference control (active agents) were: Meridol(®) : (1,400 ppm F as AmF + SnF2 ) 12.0 μm (1.47); Colgate(®) Cavity Protection: (1,450 ppm F as SMFP + NaF) 12.9 μm (1.66); Odol med 3(®) (1,400 ppm F as NaF) 14.2 μm (1.49); Elmex(®) (1,400 ppm F as AmF) 14.5 μm (1.76); Colgate(®) Enamel Protect: (1,450 ppm F as NaF + KNO3 ) 16.3 μm (2.02); Lacalut(®) aktiv: (1,400 ppm F as AlF3 ) 18.5 μm (1.71); Sensodyne(®) ProNamel(™) : (1,450 ppm F as NaF + KNO3 ) 20.5 μm (1.26); Crest Cavity Protection (1,100 ppm F as NaF, reference control) 22.00 μm (2.04); and Mentadent(®) : (1,450 ppm F as NaF + Zn citrate) 22.3 μm (0.63).
These results support the potential for the stabilised, Sn-containing NaF dentifrice to provide erosion protection benefits that are not significantly different from the positive control benchmark for erosion protection (stabilised SnF2 ), and are significantly better than a broad range of dentifrice formulations available on the European market.
评估一种稳定的含锡(Sn)的氟化钠牙膏(Oral B/blend-a-Med(®) Pro-Expert)的潜力,该牙膏除了含有多种氟化物活性成分的几种其他市售欧洲牙膏和两种对照牙膏外,还能保护牙釉质免受侵蚀性酸的损害。
将人类牙釉质的核心(每组四个)浸泡在混合的人类唾液中,然后使用标准化的体外侵蚀模型(5 天循环),用 1:3 的糊剂(牙膏:唾液)处理,该模型包括用 1%柠檬酸进行 10 分钟的挑战,在每次牙膏处理后 60 分钟进行。使用横向显微射线照相术(TMR)测量牙釉质表面损失。
用含 Sn 的 NaF 牙膏处理的标本显示出 6.5 μm 的表面损失±1.2(SEM),与临床验证的稳定 SnF2 阳性对照物[Crest(®) Pro-Health,1100 ppm F 作为 SnF2:3.0 μm 的表面损失±1.1(SEM)]无显著差异(P<0.05,Fisher LSD)。含 Sn 的 NaF 牙膏和临床验证的阳性对照均与所有其他测试产品相比,提供了显著更好的保护(P<0.05,Fisher LSD)。其他欧洲产品和参考对照(活性成分)的牙釉质损失(SEM)值为:Meridol(®):(1400 ppm F 作为 AmF+SnF2)12.0 μm(1.47);Colgate(®) Cavity Protection:(1450 ppm F 作为 SMFP+NaF)12.9 μm(1.66);Odol med 3(®)(1400 ppm F 作为 NaF)14.2 μm(1.49);Elmex(®)(1400 ppm F 作为 AmF)14.5 μm(1.76);Colgate(®) Enamel Protect:(1450 ppm F 作为 NaF+KNO3)16.3 μm(2.02);Lacalut(®) aktiv:(1400 ppm F 作为 AlF3)18.5 μm(1.71);Sensodyne(®) ProNamel(™):(1450 ppm F 作为 NaF+KNO3)20.5 μm(1.26);Crest Cavity Protection(1100 ppm F 作为 NaF,参考对照)22.00 μm(2.04);和 Mentadent(®):(1450 ppm F 作为 NaF+Zn 柠檬酸盐)22.3 μm(0.63)。
这些结果支持稳定的含 Sn 的 NaF 牙膏提供侵蚀保护益处的潜力,其与侵蚀保护的阳性对照基准(稳定的 SnF2)没有显著差异,并且明显优于欧洲市场上可获得的多种牙膏配方。