Karpettas Nikos, Destounis Antonis, Kollias Anastasios, Nasothimiou Efthimia, Moyssakis Ioannis, Stergiou George S
Hypertension Center, Third University Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Cardiology Department, Laikon Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Hypertens Res. 2014 Jun;37(6):543-7. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.24. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
Cross-sectional studies have shown that ambulatory and home blood pressure (ABP and HBP, respectively) measurements are more closely associated with preclinical organ damage than are office measurements. This study investigated the association between treatment-induced changes in BP assessed by the three methods and the corresponding changes in organ damage. Untreated hypertensives were evaluated with office, ABP and HBP measurements and indices of organ damage (echocardiographic left-ventricular mass index (LVMI), pulse wave velocity (PWV), albuminuria) before and after 12 months of treatment. A total of 116 subjects completed the study (mean age 50.7±10.5 years, 69 men (59%), mean follow-up 13.4±1.4 months). The treatment-induced change in the LVMI was correlated with changes in BP and pulse pressure (PP) assessed by all methods. The change in PWV was correlated with changes in home systolic and ABP and PP and with the change in home diastolic BP. Albuminuria showed no correlations. In linear regression models, changes in home BP and PP had the strongest predictive ability for the change in the LVMI, whereas the change in ABP was the strongest predictor of the change in PWV. The change in office BP had no predictive value. HBP and ABP measurements appear to be superior to office BP measurements and should be considered complementary rather than interchangeable methods for monitoring the effects of antihypertensive treatment on target-organ damage.
横断面研究表明,动态血压(ABP)和家庭血压(HBP)测量与临床前器官损害的关联比诊室测量更为密切。本研究调查了通过这三种方法评估的治疗引起的血压变化与器官损害相应变化之间的关联。对未经治疗的高血压患者在治疗12个月前后进行诊室、ABP和HBP测量以及器官损害指标(超声心动图左心室质量指数(LVMI)、脉搏波速度(PWV)、蛋白尿)评估。共有116名受试者完成了研究(平均年龄50.7±10.5岁,69名男性(59%),平均随访13.4±1.4个月)。通过所有方法评估的治疗引起的LVMI变化与血压和脉压(PP)变化相关。PWV变化与家庭收缩压、ABP和PP变化以及家庭舒张压变化相关。蛋白尿无相关性。在线性回归模型中,家庭血压和PP变化对LVMI变化的预测能力最强,而ABP变化是PWV变化的最强预测因子。诊室血压变化无预测价值。HBP和ABP测量似乎优于诊室血压测量,应被视为监测降压治疗对靶器官损害影响的互补而非可互换方法。