Suppr超能文献

根据美国糖尿病协会标准,通过 HbA(1c) 识别的前驱糖尿病和新发 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管风险特征。

Cardiovascular risk profile in subjects with prediabetes and new-onset type 2 diabetes identified by HbA(1c) according to American Diabetes Association criteria.

机构信息

Corresponding author: Francesco Purrello,

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2014 May;37(5):1447-53. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2357. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the cardiovascular risk profile in subjects with prediabetes and new-onset type 2 diabetes identified by glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA(1c)) according to the new American Diabetes Association criteria.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Arterial stiffness, intima-media thickness (IMT), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGEs), and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were evaluated in 274 subjects without a previous history of diabetes. The subjects were stratified into three groups according to the HbA(1c) levels.

RESULTS

The subjects with prediabetes (n = 117, HbA(1c) 5.7-6.4% [39-46 mmol/mol]) showed a higher augmentation (Aug), augmentation index (AugI), and IMT compared with those with lower HbA1c; however, these values were similar to those of subjects with HbA(1c) >6.5% (48 mmol/mol). When we further analyzed the subjects with prediabetes but included only subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NT) in the analysis, AugI and IMT still remained significantly higher than their levels in control subjects with HbA(1c) <5.7% (39 mmol/mol). After multiple regression analyses including several cardiovascular risk factors, only HbA(1c), age, and sRAGE were significantly correlated with the IMT, whereas age and 1-h postload glucose were the major determinants of AugI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that subjects with prediabetes according to HbA1c, but with both NT according to the OGTT and normal fasting glycemia, have an altered IMT and AugI. These data suggest that a simple, reproducible, and less expensive marker such as HbA1c may be better able to identify prediabetic subjects at high cardiovascular risk compared with fasting glycemia or OGTT alone.

摘要

目的

我们根据美国糖尿病协会的新标准,通过糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测,研究了新诊断的 2 型糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者的心血管风险特征。

研究设计与方法

我们评估了 274 名无糖尿病既往史的患者的动脉僵硬度、内-中膜厚度(IMT)、可溶性晚期糖基化终产物受体(sRAGE)和口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。根据 HbA1c 水平,将患者分为三组。

结果

与 HbA1c 较低的患者相比,糖尿病前期患者(n=117,HbA1c 为 5.7-6.4%[39-46mmol/mol])的增幅度(Aug)、增高速率指数(AugI)和 IMT 更高;然而,这些值与 HbA1c>6.5%(48mmol/mol)的患者相似。当我们进一步分析糖尿病前期患者,但仅将 OGTT 正常糖耐量(NT)的患者纳入分析时,AugI 和 IMT 仍显著高于 HbA1c<5.7%(39mmol/mol)的对照组患者。在包括多种心血管危险因素的多元回归分析中,只有 HbA1c、年龄和 sRAGE 与 IMT 显著相关,而年龄和 1 小时餐后血糖是 AugI 的主要决定因素。

结论

我们的数据显示,根据 HbA1c 诊断为糖尿病前期,但根据 OGTT 和空腹血糖正常的患者,其 IMT 和 AugI 发生改变。这些数据表明,与单独的空腹血糖或 OGTT 相比,HbA1c 等简单、可重复且较便宜的标志物可能更能识别心血管风险较高的糖尿病前期患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验