Waltzman Joshua T, Bell Derek E
From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
J Burn Care Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):e338-42. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000009.
The vacuum-assisted closure device (VAC) is associated with improved wound healing outcomes. Its use as a bolster device to secure a split-thickness skin graft has been previously demonstrated; however, there is little published evidence demonstrating its benefits specifically in the burn population. With use of the VAC becoming more commonplace, its effect on skin graft take and overall time to healing in burn patients deserves further investigation. Retrospective review of burn registry database at a high-volume level I trauma center and regional burn center during a 16-month period was performed. Patients who had a third-degree burn injury requiring a split-thickness skin graft and who received a VAC bolster were included. Data points included age, sex, burn mechanism, burn location, grafted area in square centimeters, need for repeat grafting, percent graft take, and time to complete reepithelialization. Sixty-seven patients were included in the study with a total of 88 skin graft sites secured with a VAC. Age ranged from <1 year to 84 years (average 41 years). The average grafted area was 367 ± 545 cm. The three most common were the leg, thigh, and arm (28, 15, and 12%, respectively). Average percent graft take was 99.5 ± 1.5%. Notably, no patients returned to the operating room for repeat grafting. The average time to complete reepithelialization was 16 ± 7 days. The VAC is a highly reliable and reproducible method to bolster a split-thickness skin graft in the burn population. The observed rate of zero returns to the operating room for repeat grafting was especially encouraging. Its ability to conform to contours of the body and cover large surface areas makes it especially useful in securing a graft. This method of bolstering results in decreased repeat grafting and minimal graft loss, thus decreasing morbidity compared with conventional bolster dressings.
负压封闭引流装置(VAC)与改善伤口愈合效果相关。此前已证明其可作为支撑装置来固定中厚皮片移植;然而,几乎没有已发表的证据表明其在烧伤患者中的具体益处。随着VAC的使用越来越普遍,其对烧伤患者皮片成活及总体愈合时间的影响值得进一步研究。对一家大型一级创伤中心和地区烧伤中心在16个月期间的烧伤登记数据库进行了回顾性分析。纳入了因三度烧伤需要中厚皮片移植且接受了VAC支撑的患者。数据点包括年龄、性别、烧伤机制、烧伤部位、移植面积(平方厘米)、重复移植的需求、皮片成活率以及完全上皮化的时间。该研究纳入了67例患者,共88个用VAC固定的皮片移植部位。年龄范围从小于1岁至84岁(平均41岁)。平均移植面积为367±545平方厘米。最常见的三个部位是腿部、大腿和手臂(分别为28%、15%和12%)。平均皮片成活率为99.5±1.5%。值得注意的是,没有患者返回手术室进行重复移植。完全上皮化的平均时间为16±7天。VAC是在烧伤患者中支撑中厚皮片移植的一种高度可靠且可重复的方法。观察到的零例返回手术室进行重复移植的比率尤其令人鼓舞。其贴合身体轮廓并覆盖大面积的能力使其在固定移植皮片方面特别有用。这种支撑方法可减少重复移植并使移植皮片损失最小化,因此与传统支撑敷料相比可降低发病率。