• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在烧伤人群中使用家用负压封闭引流装置既具有成本效益又有效。

Use of a home vacuum-assisted closure device in the burn population is both cost-effective and efficacious.

作者信息

Mushin Oren P, Bogue Jarrod T, Esquenazi Mica D, Toscano Nicole, Bell Derek E

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center, United States.

University of Rochester Medical Center, United States.

出版信息

Burns. 2017 May;43(3):490-494. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.08.038. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2016.08.038
PMID:28256293
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The vacuum assisted closure device (VAC) improves wound-healing when utilized as a bolster to secure split thickness skin grafts (STSG). Patients typically remain hospitalized for VAC therapy; however, home VACs (hVAC) are now available. Limited studies examine burns treated with hVAC as a STSG bolster.

METHOD

A retrospective study of records from an ABA verified regional burn center was conducted over 23 months. Patients included STSGs for burn. Data points included demographics, burn mechanism and location, graft characteristics, hospital length of stay (LOS), and time to heal.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Fifty patients were included, with average age of 39 years (range <1-83years). Average burn TBSA was 1.27±1.42 (range 0.05-8.18). Grafted area average was 102.9±128.1cm. The most commonly treated areas were the leg/foot, thigh, and torso (53%, 16%, and 16%, respectively). Average LOS was 1.1±1.2 days. Mean graft-take was 99.2±2.8% with one patient undergoing repeat STSG. Average post-operative time to heal was 16±6 days. A 5-day inpatient stay with a VAC costs an average of $34,635, compared to $9134 for an hVAC over the same period.

CONCLUSIONS

The hVAC is a cost-effective STSG bolster in the burn population for appropriate candidates. Excellent graft-take and low morbidity rates imply that this is an efficacious alternative for STSG bolster.

摘要

引言

真空辅助闭合装置(VAC)在用作支撑以固定中厚皮片(STSG)时可改善伤口愈合。患者通常因VAC治疗而住院;然而,现在已有家用VAC(hVAC)。有限的研究探讨了使用hVAC作为STSG支撑物治疗烧伤的情况。

方法

对一家经ABA认证的地区烧伤中心23个月期间的记录进行回顾性研究。患者包括因烧伤接受STSG治疗的患者。数据点包括人口统计学、烧伤机制和部位、移植特征、住院时间(LOS)和愈合时间。

结果与讨论

纳入50例患者,平均年龄39岁(范围<1 - 83岁)。平均烧伤总面积为1.27±1.42(范围0.05 - 8.18)。移植面积平均为102.9±128.1平方厘米。最常治疗的部位是腿部/足部、大腿和躯干(分别为53%、16%和16%)。平均住院时间为1.1±1.2天。平均移植成活率为99.2±2.8%,有1例患者接受了再次STSG。术后平均愈合时间为16±6天。使用VAC住院5天的平均费用为34,635美元,而同期使用hVAC的费用为9134美元。

结论

对于合适的烧伤患者,hVAC是一种具有成本效益的STSG支撑物。出色的移植成活率和低发病率表明这是STSG支撑的一种有效替代方法。

相似文献

1
Use of a home vacuum-assisted closure device in the burn population is both cost-effective and efficacious.在烧伤人群中使用家用负压封闭引流装置既具有成本效益又有效。
Burns. 2017 May;43(3):490-494. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.08.038. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
2
Vacuum-assisted closure device as a split-thickness skin graft bolster in the burn population.负压封闭引流装置作为烧伤患者中刃厚皮片的支撑物
J Burn Care Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):e338-42. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000009.
3
Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two methods of securing skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy: vacuum-assisted closure and gauze suction.比较使用负压伤口治疗固定皮肤移植的两种方法的前瞻性随机对照试验:真空辅助闭合和纱布抽吸。
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):324-8. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000089.
4
The vacuum assisted closure device: a method of securing skin grafts and improving graft survival.负压封闭引流装置:一种固定皮肤移植片并提高移植片存活率的方法。
Arch Surg. 2002 Aug;137(8):930-3; discussion 933-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.8.930.
5
Extra-large negative pressure wound therapy dressings for burns - Initial experience with technique, fluid management, and outcomes.用于烧伤的超大号负压伤口治疗敷料——技术、液体管理及治疗效果的初步经验
Burns. 2016 Mar;42(2):457-65. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.034. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
6
A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure dressing and conventional dressing methods on split-thickness skin grafts in burned patients.一项比较负压敷料和常规敷料方法对烧伤患者进行刃厚皮片移植的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Burns. 2011 Sep;37(6):925-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
7
Vacuum-assisted closure therapy as a pretreatment for split thickness skin grafts.负压封闭引流治疗作为削痂植皮的预处理措施
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Oct;20(10):675-9.
8
A retrospective analysis of securing autologous split-thickness skin grafts with negative pressure wound therapy in paediatric burn patients.对小儿烧伤患者采用负压伤口治疗固定自体中厚皮片的回顾性分析。
Burns. 2014 Sep;40(6):1116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
9
Cost analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation for wound bed preparation preceding split-thickness skin grafts for massive (>100 cm(2)) chronic venous leg ulcers.在进行大面积(>100平方厘米)慢性下肢静脉溃疡的断层皮片移植前,采用滴注式负压伤口治疗进行伤口床准备的成本分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):995-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.076. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
Length of Stay and Costs with Autologous Skin Cell Suspension Versus Split-Thickness Skin Grafts: Burn Care Data from US Centers.自体皮肤细胞悬液与断层皮片移植术治疗烧伤的住院时间和费用比较:来自美国烧伤中心的数据
Adv Ther. 2022 Nov;39(11):5191-5202. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02306-y. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy in paediatric burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.负压伤口治疗在小儿烧伤中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05302-z.
2
Roles of negative pressure wound therapy for scar revision.负压伤口治疗在瘢痕修复中的作用。
Front Physiol. 2023 Oct 12;14:1194051. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1194051. eCollection 2023.
3
Cost-effectiveness of adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy in paediatric burn care: evidence from the SONATA in C randomised controlled trial.
辅助性负压伤口疗法在儿科烧伤护理中的成本效益:来自 SONATA in C 随机对照试验的证据。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 17;11(1):16650. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95893-9.