• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

树冠层中受非洲食草有蹄类大小结构群体影响的饲料质量的垂直分带现象。

Vertical zonation of browse quality in tree canopies exposed to a size-structured guild of African browsing ungulates.

机构信息

Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, 0002, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2001 Dec;129(4):585-590. doi: 10.1007/s004420100771. Epub 2001 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s004420100771
PMID:24577699
Abstract

We investigated whether the food quality of tree foliage for African savanna browsers varies across the feeding height range of the guild. This was to address the question of why giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis) generally feed at a higher level in the canopy than is accessible to all other browsers. We defined a giraffe browse unit (GBU) as the length of twig corresponding to the average "bite" taken by giraffes from two staple browse plants: Acacia nigrescens and Boscia albitrunca. We sampled at three study sites in South Africa in the late dry season, at each site clipping GBUs at three heights above ground: 0.5 m, 1.5 m and 2.5 m; these representing the levels typically browsed by small, medium and large-bodied browsing ungulates respectively. For each GBU we measured leaf dry mass, total N, neutral detergent fibre and condensed tannin, using near-infrared spectroscopy calibrated by conventional laboratory analyses. We found no differences between height levels with regard to leaf chemistry concentrations, but leaf biomass per GBU was significantly higher at the 1.5-m and 2.5-m levels than at the 0.5-m level. The larger browsers thus gain a bite-size advantage by browsing above the reach of the smaller species. A likely reason for the reduced leaf biomass per GBU at the low browsing level is the tendency for small browsers to pluck individual leaves from shoots, while large browsers prune off whole shoots. We contend that our findings are analogous to those from parallel studies on the grazing guild, and are consistent with the hypothesis that the smaller members of ungulate guilds competitively displace the larger ones from shared feeding sites when resources become restricted. A prediction of this hypothesis is that the smaller members of each guild drive the grazing succession from behind and maintain browsing height stratification from below.

摘要

我们研究了非洲热带稀树草原食草动物的食物质量是否随觅食高度的变化而变化。这是为了解决为什么长颈鹿(Giraffa camelopardalis)通常在树冠层的较高位置觅食,而其他所有食草动物都无法到达这个位置。我们将长颈鹿觅食单位(GBU)定义为对应于长颈鹿从两种主要的灌木植物(Acacia nigrescens 和 Boscia albitrunca)中“咬”下的树枝长度。我们在南非的三个研究地点进行了采样,在每个地点,我们从地面以上 0.5 m、1.5 m 和 2.5 m 的三个高度剪取 GBU;这些高度分别代表小型、中型和大型有蹄类动物通常的觅食高度。对于每个 GBU,我们使用近红外光谱法(通过常规实验室分析校准)测量叶片干质量、总氮、中性洗涤剂纤维和单宁。我们发现叶片化学物质浓度在高度上没有差异,但每个 GBU 的叶片生物量在 1.5 m 和 2.5 m 高度显著高于 0.5 m 高度。因此,较大的食草动物通过在较小物种够不到的高度觅食,获得了一口大小的优势。在低觅食水平下,每个 GBU 的叶片生物量减少的一个可能原因是,较小的食草动物倾向于从嫩枝上摘单个叶子,而较大的食草动物则会修剪整个嫩枝。我们认为,我们的发现与关于放牧动物群的平行研究相似,与假设一致,即在资源受到限制时,食草动物群中的较小成员会从共享的觅食地点排挤较大成员。这一假设的一个预测是,每个动物群的较小成员会从后面推动放牧演替,并从下面维持觅食高度的分层。

相似文献

1
Vertical zonation of browse quality in tree canopies exposed to a size-structured guild of African browsing ungulates.树冠层中受非洲食草有蹄类大小结构群体影响的饲料质量的垂直分带现象。
Oecologia. 2001 Dec;129(4):585-590. doi: 10.1007/s004420100771. Epub 2001 Aug 31.
2
Winning by a neck: tall giraffes avoid competing with shorter browsers.以微小优势取胜:高大的长颈鹿避免与较矮的食草动物竞争。
Am Nat. 2007 Jan;169(1):130-5. doi: 10.1086/509940. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
3
Browsing lawns? Responses of Acacia nigrescens to ungulate browsing in an African savanna.浏览草坪?黑荆树对非洲稀树草原中有蹄类动物啃食的反应。
Ecology. 2007 Jan;88(1):200-9. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[200:blroan]2.0.co;2.
4
DNA left on browsed twigs uncovers bite-scale resource use patterns in European ungulates.留在啃食过的嫩枝上的DNA揭示了欧洲有蹄类动物按咬痕大小划分的资源利用模式。
Oecologia. 2015 May;178(1):275-84. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3196-z. Epub 2014 Dec 28.
5
Generalities in grazing and browsing ecology: using across-guild comparisons to control contingencies.放牧和啃食生态学概论:利用跨类群比较来控制偶然事件。
Oecologia. 2014 Apr;174(4):1075-83. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2864-8. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
6
Foliage acceptability to browsing ruminants in relation to seasonal changes in the leaf chemistry of woody plants in a South African savanna.南非稀树草原木本植物叶片化学组成的季节性变化与食草反刍动物对树叶可接受性的关系
Oecologia. 1988 Apr;75(3):336-342. doi: 10.1007/BF00376934.
7
An investigation of browsing enrichment, especially non-leaf foraging, on giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata) at Kyoto City Zoo in Japan.对日本京都城市动物园的长颈鹿(网纹长颈鹿)的浏览富集行为,尤其是非树叶觅食行为的一项调查。
Zoo Biol. 2023 Jan;42(1):157-161. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21726. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
8
Large herbivores facilitate savanna tree establishment via diverse and indirect pathways.大型食草动物通过多样且间接的途径促进稀树草原树木的建立。
J Anim Ecol. 2010 Mar;79(2):372-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01644.x. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
9
Resources and Habitat Requirements for Giraffes' () Diet Selection in the Northwestern Kalahari, South Africa.南非喀拉哈里沙漠西北部长颈鹿饮食选择的资源与栖息地需求
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 3;13(13):2188. doi: 10.3390/ani13132188.
10
Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore.作为与尺度相关的机制,饲草数量、质量和可利用性驱动大型食草动物的生境选择。
J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jul;79(4):910-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01701.x. Epub 2010 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
DNA left on browsed twigs uncovers bite-scale resource use patterns in European ungulates.留在啃食过的嫩枝上的DNA揭示了欧洲有蹄类动物按咬痕大小划分的资源利用模式。
Oecologia. 2015 May;178(1):275-84. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3196-z. Epub 2014 Dec 28.
2
Generalities in grazing and browsing ecology: using across-guild comparisons to control contingencies.放牧和啃食生态学概论:利用跨类群比较来控制偶然事件。
Oecologia. 2014 Apr;174(4):1075-83. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2864-8. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
3
The articulation of sauropod necks: methodology and mythology.
蜥脚类恐龙颈部的关节:方法与神话。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e78572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078572. eCollection 2013.
4
Fecal near infrared spectroscopy to discriminate physiological status in giant pandas.粪便近红外光谱分析鉴别大熊猫的生理状态。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038908. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
5
Bush selection along foraging pathways by sympatric impala and greater kudu.同域分布的黑斑羚和大羚羊在觅食路径上对灌木的选择
Oecologia. 2004 Sep;141(1):66-75. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1630-3. Epub 2004 Jul 23.
6
The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters.食草哺乳动物可达到的最大体型:前肠的形态生理限制及后肠发酵动物的适应性
Oecologia. 2003 Jun;136(1):14-27. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1254-z. Epub 2003 Apr 24.