Hung Guang-Uei, Huang Jin-Long, Lin Wan-Yu, Tsai Shih-Chung, Wang Kuo-Yang, Chen Shih-Ann, Lloyd Michael S, Chen Ji
Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jun;41(6):1224-31. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2693-y. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
The use of SPECT phase analysis to optimize left-ventricular (LV) lead positions for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was performed at baseline, but CRT works as simultaneous right ventricular (RV) and LV pacing. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of RV apical (RVA) pacing on optimal LV lead positions measured by SPECT phase analysis.
This study prospectively enrolled 46 patients. Two SPECT myocardial perfusion scans were acquired under sinus rhythm with complete left bundle branch block and RVA pacing, respectively, following a single injection of (99m)Tc-sestamibi. LV dyssynchrony parameters and optimal LV lead positions were measured by the phase analysis technique and then compared between the two scans.
The LV dyssynchrony parameters were significantly larger with RVA pacing than with sinus rhythm (p ~0.01). In 39 of the 46 patients, the optimal LV lead positions were the same between RVA pacing and sinus rhythm (kappa = 0.861). In 6 of the remaining 7 patients, the optimal LV lead positions were along the same radial direction, but RVA pacing shifted the optimal LV lead positions toward the base.
The optimal LV lead positions measured by SPECT phase analysis were consistent, no matter whether the SPECT images were acquired under sinus rhythm or RVA pacing. In some patients, RVA pacing shifted the optimal LV lead positions toward the base. This study supports the use of baseline SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging to optimize LV lead positions to increase CRT efficacy.
在基线时采用单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)相位分析来优化心脏再同步治疗(CRT)中左心室(LV)导线的位置,但CRT是右心室(RV)和LV同时起搏。本研究的目的是评估右心室心尖部(RVA)起搏对通过SPECT相位分析测量的最佳LV导线位置的影响。
本研究前瞻性纳入46例患者。单次注射(99m)锝- sestamibi后,分别在窦性心律伴完全性左束支传导阻滞和RVA起搏状态下进行两次SPECT心肌灌注扫描。通过相位分析技术测量LV不同步参数和最佳LV导线位置,然后对两次扫描结果进行比较。
RVA起搏时的LV不同步参数显著大于窦性心律时(p约0.01)。46例患者中有39例,RVA起搏和窦性心律时的最佳LV导线位置相同(kappa = 0.861)。其余7例患者中有6例,最佳LV导线位置沿相同径向方向,但RVA起搏使最佳LV导线位置向心底移位。
无论SPECT图像是在窦性心律还是RVA起搏状态下采集,通过SPECT相位分析测量的最佳LV导线位置是一致的。在一些患者中,RVA起搏使最佳LV导线位置向心底移位。本研究支持使用基线SPECT心肌灌注成像来优化LV导线位置以提高CRT疗效。