Zhang Hongxiang, Hou Xiaofeng, Wang Yao, Xue Sheliang, Cao Kejiang, Chen Ji, Zou Jiangang
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China,
J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Oct;21(5):958-66. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9912-6. Epub 2014 May 29.
This study aimed to assess acute and chronic effects of right ventricular mid-septum (RVS) versus right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing on left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).
Thirty-nine patients with complete atrioventricular (AV) block, who were indicated for permanent pacing, were recruited and randomized to receive RVA (n = 20) or RVS (n = 19) pacing. All patients underwent MPI at 1 week and 6 months after pacemaker implantation. LV dyssynchrony and cardiac function were assessed by MPI and compared between the two groups.
There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the RVS and RVA groups. The paced QRS duration was significantly longer in the RVA group than in the RVS group. LV dyssynchrony parameters were not significantly different between the groups at the 1-week follow-up, but they were significantly smaller in the RVS group than in the RVA group at the 6-month follow-up. LV dyssynchrony parameters significantly decreased in the RVS group from the 1-week follow-up to the 6-month follow-up, but were unchanged in the RVA group. No differences in LV function parameters were observed between the groups at the 1-week and 6-month follow-ups.
RVS pacing produces better electrical and mechanical synchrony than RVA pacing for patients with complete AV block.
本研究旨在利用门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像(MPI)的相位分析,评估右心室中隔(RVS)起搏与右心室心尖(RVA)起搏对左心室(LV)机械性不同步的急性和慢性影响。
招募39例有永久性起搏指征的完全性房室(AV)传导阻滞患者,并随机分为接受RVA起搏(n = 20)或RVS起搏(n = 19)两组。所有患者在起搏器植入后1周和6个月接受MPI检查。通过MPI评估LV不同步性和心功能,并在两组之间进行比较。
RVS组和RVA组的基线特征无显著差异。RVA组的起搏QRS时限显著长于RVS组。两组在1周随访时LV不同步参数无显著差异,但在6个月随访时,RVS组显著小于RVA组。RVS组的LV不同步参数从1周随访到6个月随访显著降低,而RVA组则无变化。两组在1周和6个月随访时LV功能参数无差异。
对于完全性AV传导阻滞患者,RVS起搏比RVA起搏产生更好的电和机械同步性。