McCracken Lance M, Morley Stephen
Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London & INPUT Pain Management Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
J Pain. 2014 Mar;15(3):221-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.014.
Scientific models are like tools, and like any tool they can be evaluated according to how well they achieve the chosen goals of the task at hand. In the science of treatment development for chronic pain, we might say that a good model ought to achieve at least 3 goals: 1) integrate current knowledge, 2) organize research and treatment development activities, and 3) create progress. In the current review, we examine models underlying current cognitive behavioral approaches to chronic pain with respect to these criteria. A relatively new model is also presented as an option, and some of its features examined. This model is called the psychological flexibility model. This model fully integrates cognitive and behavioral principles and includes a process-oriented approach of treatment development. So far it appears capable of generating treatment applications that range widely with regard to conditions targeted and modes of delivery and that are increasingly supported by evidence. It has led to the generation of innovative experiential, relationship-based, and intensive treatment methods. The scientific strategy associated with this model seeks to find limitations in current models and to update them. It is assumed within this strategy that all current treatment approaches will one day appear lacking and will change.
This Focus Article addresses the place of theory and models in psychological research and treatment development in chronic pain. It is argued that such models are not merely an academic issue but are highly practical. One potential model, the psychological flexibility model, is examined in further detail.
科学模型就像工具,和任何工具一样,可以根据它们实现手头任务既定目标的程度来评估。在慢性疼痛治疗发展科学中,我们可以说一个好的模型应该至少实现三个目标:1)整合现有知识,2)组织研究和治疗发展活动,3)取得进展。在当前综述中,我们根据这些标准审视当前慢性疼痛认知行为疗法背后的模型。还提出了一个相对较新的模型作为一种选择,并对其一些特征进行了研究。这个模型称为心理灵活性模型。该模型全面整合了认知和行为原则,并包括一种以过程为导向的治疗发展方法。到目前为止,它似乎能够产生在目标病症和交付方式方面范围广泛且越来越有证据支持的治疗应用。它已促成创新的体验式、基于关系的和强化治疗方法的产生。与该模型相关的科学策略旨在发现当前模型的局限性并对其进行更新。在这一策略中假定,所有当前的治疗方法有朝一日都会显得不足并发生变化。
这篇聚焦文章探讨了理论和模型在慢性疼痛心理研究和治疗发展中的地位。有人认为,此类模型不仅是一个学术问题,而且具有高度实用性。对一个潜在模型——心理灵活性模型进行了更详细的审视。