Horwood Anna M, Toor Sonia S, Riddell Patricia M
Infant Vision Laboratory, School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, United Kingdom; Orthoptic Department, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, United Kingdom.
Infant Vision Laboratory, School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, United Kingdom.
J AAPOS. 2014 Apr;18(2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.11.008. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
Although eye exercises appear to help heterophoria, convergence insufficiency, and intermittent strabismus, results can be confounded by placebo, practice, and encouragement effects. This study assessed objective changes in vergence and accommodation responses in naive young adults after a 2-week period of eye exercises under controlled conditions to determine the extent to which treatment effects occur over other factors.
Asymptomatic young adults were randomly assigned to one of two no-treatment (control) groups or to one of six eye exercise groups: accommodation, vergence, both, convergence in excess of accommodation, accommodation in excess of convergence, and placebo. Subjects were tested and retested under identical conditions, except for the second control group, who were additionally encouraged. Objective accommodation and vergence were assessed to a range of targets moving in depth containing combinations of blur, disparity, and proximity/looming cues.
A total of 156 subjects were included. Response gain improved more for less naturalistic targets where more improvement was possible. Convergence exercises improved vergence for near across all targets (P = 0.035). Mean accommodation changed similarly but nonsignificantly. No other treatment group differed significantly from the nonencouraged control group, whereas encouraging effort produced significantly increased vergence (P = 0.004) and accommodation (P = 0.005) gains in the second control group.
True treatment effects were small, significantly better only after vergence exercises to a nonaccommodative target, and rarely related to the response they were designed to improve. Exercising accommodation without convergence made no difference to accommodation to cues containing detail. Additional effort improved objective responses the most.
尽管眼保健操似乎有助于治疗隐斜视、集合不足和间歇性斜视,但其结果可能会受到安慰剂、练习和鼓励效应的干扰。本研究评估了在受控条件下进行为期2周的眼保健操后,未接受过相关训练的年轻成年人的融合和调节反应的客观变化,以确定治疗效果相对于其他因素的发生程度。
无症状的年轻成年人被随机分配到两个不治疗(对照)组之一,或六个眼保健操组之一:调节、融合、两者皆有、集合超过调节、调节超过集合和安慰剂组。除了第二个对照组额外受到鼓励外,所有受试者在相同条件下进行测试和重新测试。对一系列在深度上移动的目标进行客观调节和融合评估,这些目标包含模糊、视差和接近/逼近线索的组合。
共纳入156名受试者。对于更不自然的目标,反应增益改善得更多,因为这些目标有更大的改善空间。集合练习改善了所有目标近距离的融合能力(P = 0.035)。平均调节变化相似,但无显著差异。没有其他治疗组与未受鼓励的对照组有显著差异,而在第二个对照组中,鼓励措施使融合(P = 0.004)和调节(P = 0.005)增益显著增加。
真正的治疗效果很小,仅在对非调节性目标进行融合练习后显著更好,并且很少与它们旨在改善的反应相关。单独进行调节练习而不进行融合练习,对包含细节线索的调节没有影响。额外的努力对客观反应的改善最为明显。