Casartelli Nicola C, Lepers Romuald, Maffiuletti Nicola A
Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland; INSERM U1093-Cognition, Action and Sensory Plasticity, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Muscle Nerve. 2014 Dec;50(6):932-8. doi: 10.1002/mus.24229. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
The aim of this study was to evaluate test feasibility, validity, and reproducibility of the rate of force development scaling factor (RFD-SF) for the hip muscles.
Feasibility was assessed as the testing compliance, validity as the ability to compute the RFD-SF from a linear regression, and reproducibility with a test-retest design in 20 healthy subjects. Reliability and agreement (reproducibility) were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3,1) and percent standard error of measurement (SEM), respectively.
The RFD-SF testing protocol was completed successfully by all subjects, although the analysis had to be modified for hip rotators. Reliability was high (ICC3,1 > 0.70) for all muscles except hip abductors (ICC3,1 = 0.69) and internal rotators (ICC3,1 = 0.58). Agreement was high for all muscles (SEM < 10%).
Hip adductor, flexor, and external rotator RFD-SF can be evaluated with confidence, provided the analysis is modified for external rotators, whereas hip abductor and internal rotator RFD-SF assessment is not recommended.
本研究旨在评估髋部肌肉力量发展速率缩放因子(RFD-SF)测试的可行性、有效性和可重复性。
评估可行性时,以测试依从性作为指标;评估有效性时,以通过线性回归计算RFD-SF的能力作为指标;在20名健康受试者中采用重测设计评估可重复性。分别使用组内相关系数(ICC3,1)和测量标准误差百分比(SEM)评估可靠性和一致性(可重复性)。
所有受试者均成功完成了RFD-SF测试方案,不过对髋部旋转肌的分析不得不进行修改。除髋外展肌(ICC3,1 = 0.69)和内旋肌(ICC3,1 = 0.58)外,所有肌肉的可靠性都很高(ICC3,1 > 0.70)。所有肌肉的一致性都很高(SEM < 10%)。
只要对外旋肌的分析进行修改,就可以放心地评估髋内收肌、屈肌和外旋肌的RFD-SF,而不建议评估髋外展肌和内旋肌的RFD-SF。