Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department & Centre Investigation Clinique, Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, INSERM CIC, Marseille.
Ann Oncol. 2014 May;25(5):1044-52. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu098. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
The randomized, phase III AVAPERL trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab maintenance with or without pemetrexed in nonsquamous nonsmall-cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged with bevacizumab-pemetrexed, but overall survival (OS) data were immature. In this article, we report an independent, updated analysis of survival outcomes in AVAPERL.
Patients with advanced nsNSCLC received first-line bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)), and pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks (q3w) for four cycles. Nonprogressing patients were randomized to maintenance bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) or bevacizumab-pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) q3w until progression or consent withdrawal. The primary end point of the trial was PFS; in this independent OS analysis, participating study centers were contacted to collect survival data on patients still alive at the time of the first analysis.
A total of 376 patients received induction treatment. Disease control was confirmed in 71.9% of patients; 253 patients were randomized to maintenance treatment with bevacizumab (n = 125) or bevacizumab-pemetrexed (n = 128). At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, patients allocated to bevacizumab-pemetrexed had significantly improved PFS versus those on bevacizumab when measured from randomization [7.4 versus 3.7 months, hazard ratio (HR), 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.75); P < 0.0001]. OS events occurred in 58% of all patients. OS was numerically longer with bevacizumab-pemetrexed versus bevacizumab when measured from randomization [17.1 versus 13.2 months, HR 0.87 (0.63-1.21); P = 0.29]. Second-line therapy was administered in 77% and 70% of patients in the bevacizumab and bevacizumab-pemetrexed arms, respectively. No new adverse events were reported during this updated analysis.
In an unselected population of nsNSCLC patients achieving disease control on platinum-based induction therapy, maintenance with bevacizumab-pemetrexed was associated with a nonsignificant increase in OS over bevacizumab alone.
随机、三期 AVAPERL 试验评估了贝伐单抗维持治疗联合或不联合培美曲塞在非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(nsNSCLC)中的安全性和疗效。贝伐单抗-培美曲塞联合治疗显著延长了无进展生存期(PFS),但总生存期(OS)数据不成熟。在本文中,我们报告了 AVAPERL 中生存结果的独立更新分析。
晚期 nsNSCLC 患者接受一线贝伐单抗(7.5mg/kg)、顺铂(75mg/m2)和培美曲塞(500mg/m2)每 3 周(q3w)治疗 4 个周期。无进展患者随机分配至维持贝伐单抗(7.5mg/kg)或贝伐单抗-培美曲塞(500mg/m2)q3w,直至疾病进展或同意退出。试验的主要终点是 PFS;在这项独立的 OS 分析中,联系了参与研究中心,以收集首次分析时仍存活的患者的生存数据。
共有 376 名患者接受了诱导治疗。71.9%的患者确认疾病得到控制;253 名患者随机分配至贝伐单抗维持治疗(n=125)或贝伐单抗-培美曲塞(n=128)。在中位随访 14.8 个月时,与贝伐单抗相比,贝伐单抗-培美曲塞组患者的 PFS 显著改善[7.4 个月对 3.7 个月,风险比(HR)0.57,95%置信区间(CI)0.44-0.75;P<0.0001]。所有患者中 58%发生 OS 事件。与贝伐单抗相比,贝伐单抗-培美曲塞组从随机分组开始的 OS 时间更长[17.1 个月对 13.2 个月,HR 0.87(0.63-1.21);P=0.29]。贝伐单抗和贝伐单抗-培美曲塞组分别有 77%和 70%的患者接受二线治疗。在本次更新分析中未报告新的不良事件。
在接受基于铂类的诱导治疗后疾病得到控制的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者中,与贝伐单抗单药维持治疗相比,贝伐单抗-培美曲塞维持治疗可使 OS 略有增加,但无统计学意义。