From Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Feb;12(2):221-7. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0023.
The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Distress Management have, since 1997, called for routine screening of distress in patients with cancer. Following the example of pain as the fifth vital sign, the case for using the concept of distress as the sixth vital sign was made by leading psycho-oncologists in 2007. Cancer care organizations in Canada and the International Psycho-Oncology Society have adopted the NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management and have named distress screening as the sixth vital sign, thereby encouraging cancer care clinicians to think of screening for distress when they screen for pain and other vital signs. Using the evidence integration triangle, this article explores the dissemination of the notion of distress as the sixth vital sign in an international context. This exploration shows that NCCN and similar organizations can adopt the evidence integration triangle in its next phase of moving toward full implementation of the NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management.
自 1997 年以来,美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)肿瘤学临床实践指南(NCCN 指南)一直呼吁对癌症患者的痛苦进行常规筛查。在将疼痛作为第五大生命体征的范例之后,领先的心理肿瘤学家于 2007 年提出了将痛苦概念用作第六大生命体征的概念。加拿大的癌症护理组织和国际心理肿瘤学会已经采用了 NCCN 痛苦管理指南,并将痛苦筛查命名为第六大生命体征,从而鼓励癌症护理临床医生在筛查疼痛和其他生命体征时考虑筛查痛苦。本文使用证据整合三角,在国际背景下探讨了痛苦作为第六大生命体征的概念的传播。这一探索表明,NCCN 和类似组织可以在迈向全面实施 NCCN 痛苦管理指南的下一阶段采用证据整合三角。