Suppr超能文献

围绕结肠直肠手术质量评估的争议。

Controversies surrounding quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.

作者信息

O'Brien Brendan S, McNally Michael P, Duncan James E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Mar;27(1):26-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366916.

Abstract

Quality improvement in health care has become a major topic of discussion among health care providers, patients, insurance companies, and the government. National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP), along with a multitude of other programs, exists in an attempt to create objective data that can be used to compare hospitals and providers against a national average. Studies have shown that despite good patient care and proper surgical technique, patients who undergo procedures such as colectomy have a higher incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and other morbidities. Therefore, hospitals with a large volume of colon and rectal surgery cases are routinely identified as "high outliers" in these quality improvement programs. Programs, such as NSQIP, may not be the best way to measure quality in specific subspecialties such as colon and rectal surgery.

摘要

医疗保健质量改进已成为医疗保健提供者、患者、保险公司和政府之间讨论的一个主要话题。国家外科质量改进项目(NSQIP)以及众多其他项目的存在,旨在创建客观数据,可用于将医院和医疗服务提供者与全国平均水平进行比较。研究表明,尽管有良好的患者护理和适当的手术技术,但接受结肠切除术等手术的患者发生手术部位感染(SSI)和其他并发症的发生率较高。因此,在这些质量改进项目中,进行大量结肠和直肠手术病例的医院通常被认定为“高异常值”。像NSQIP这样的项目可能不是衡量结肠和直肠手术等特定亚专业质量的最佳方式。

相似文献

1
Controversies surrounding quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Mar;27(1):26-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366916.
2
Creation and Institutional Validation of a Readmission Risk Calculator for Elective Colorectal Surgery.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Oct;63(10):1436-1445. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001674.
3
A comparison of 2 surgical site infection monitoring systems.
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):51-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2891.
5
Effects of Colorectal Surgery Classification on Reported Postoperative Surgical Site Infections.
J Surg Res. 2019 Apr;236:340-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
7
Current status of quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Mar;27(1):10-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366913.
8
Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital readmission by method of data collection.
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.057. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
3
Comparison of anastomotic leak rate after colorectal surgery using different databases.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):638-44. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827886db.
4
Urinary tract infection after colon and rectal resections: more common than predicted by risk-adjustment models.
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Dec;213(6):784-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
5
Morbidity and mortality after colorectal procedures: comparison of data from the American College of Surgeons case log system and the ACS NSQIP.
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):1077-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
9
Surgical site infections in a "high outlier" institution: are colorectal surgeons to blame?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Mar;52(3):374-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819a5e45.
10
Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery.
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.138. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验