• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Controversies surrounding quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.围绕结肠直肠手术质量评估的争议。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Mar;27(1):26-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366916.
2
Creation and Institutional Validation of a Readmission Risk Calculator for Elective Colorectal Surgery.择期结直肠手术再入院风险计算器的创建与机构验证
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Oct;63(10):1436-1445. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001674.
3
A comparison of 2 surgical site infection monitoring systems.两种手术部位感染监测系统的比较。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):51-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2891.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Effects of Colorectal Surgery Classification on Reported Postoperative Surgical Site Infections.结直肠手术分类对术后手术部位感染报告的影响。
J Surg Res. 2019 Apr;236:340-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
6
Improving Outcomes in Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Single-institution Retrospective Review.改善择期结直肠手术的治疗效果:一项单机构回顾性研究
Am Surg. 2016 Apr;82(4):325-30.
7
Current status of quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.结肠直肠手术质量评估的现状
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Mar;27(1):10-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366913.
8
Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.医疗服务量与健康结果:来自系统评价及意大利医院数据评估的证据
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.
9
Laparoscopic approach significantly reduces surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: data from national surgical quality improvement program.腹腔镜方法显著降低结直肠手术后手术部位感染:来自国家手术质量改进计划的数据。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Aug;211(2):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.028. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
10
The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.美国退伍军人事务部的国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP):首个全国性、经过验证、基于结果、风险调整且由同行控制的用于衡量和提升外科护理质量的计划。国家退伍军人事务部外科质量改进计划。
Ann Surg. 1998 Oct;228(4):491-507. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationships between multiple patient safety outcomes and healthcare and hospital-related risk factors in colorectal resection cases: cross-sectional evidence from a nationwide sample of 232 German hospitals.在结直肠切除术病例中,多种患者安全结局与医疗保健和医院相关风险因素之间的关系:来自全国 232 家德国医院的样本的横断面证据。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 25;12(7):e058481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058481.
2
Clostridial Infection After Open Fractures of the Lower Extremity - Report of Two Cases and Discussion of Pathomechanism and Treatment.下肢开放性骨折后梭状芽孢杆菌感染-两例报告并探讨发病机制和治疗。
In Vivo. 2020 Jan-Feb;34(1):291-298. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11773.
3
The need for unique risk adjustment for surgical site infections at a high-volume, tertiary care center with inherent high-risk colorectal procedures.在高容量的三级护理中心,由于存在固有高风险的结直肠手术,需要对手术部位感染进行独特的风险调整。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):649-656. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1671-3. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital readmission by method of data collection.医院再入院方法的数据采集。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.057. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
2
Surgical care improvement project and surgical site infections: can integration in the surgical safety checklist improve quality performance and clinical outcomes?外科手术质量改进项目与手术部位感染:将其纳入外科安全检查表是否能够改善质量绩效和临床结局?
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.048. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
3
Comparison of anastomotic leak rate after colorectal surgery using different databases.不同数据库在结直肠手术后吻合口漏发生率方面的比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):638-44. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827886db.
4
Urinary tract infection after colon and rectal resections: more common than predicted by risk-adjustment models.结直肠切除术后的尿路感染:比风险调整模型预测的更常见。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Dec;213(6):784-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
5
Morbidity and mortality after colorectal procedures: comparison of data from the American College of Surgeons case log system and the ACS NSQIP.结直肠手术后的发病率和死亡率:美国外科医师学会病例记录系统和 ACS NSQIP 数据的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):1077-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
6
Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement.外科手术护理改进项目感染相关过程指标符合风险调整结果的关联性:对质量测量的启示。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Dec;211(6):705-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.006.
7
Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score.改进美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划风险调整:纳入新的手术风险评分。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Dec;211(6):715-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.021. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
8
Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections.手术护理改进项目措施的依从性与术后感染的关系。
JAMA. 2010 Jun 23;303(24):2479-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.841.
9
Surgical site infections in a "high outlier" institution: are colorectal surgeons to blame?一家“高异常值”机构中的手术部位感染:结直肠外科医生该为此负责吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Mar;52(3):374-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819a5e45.
10
Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery.优先考虑普通外科的质量改进。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.138. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

围绕结肠直肠手术质量评估的争议。

Controversies surrounding quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.

作者信息

O'Brien Brendan S, McNally Michael P, Duncan James E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Mar;27(1):26-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366916.

DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1366916
PMID:24587701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3926922/
Abstract

Quality improvement in health care has become a major topic of discussion among health care providers, patients, insurance companies, and the government. National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP), along with a multitude of other programs, exists in an attempt to create objective data that can be used to compare hospitals and providers against a national average. Studies have shown that despite good patient care and proper surgical technique, patients who undergo procedures such as colectomy have a higher incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and other morbidities. Therefore, hospitals with a large volume of colon and rectal surgery cases are routinely identified as "high outliers" in these quality improvement programs. Programs, such as NSQIP, may not be the best way to measure quality in specific subspecialties such as colon and rectal surgery.

摘要

医疗保健质量改进已成为医疗保健提供者、患者、保险公司和政府之间讨论的一个主要话题。国家外科质量改进项目(NSQIP)以及众多其他项目的存在,旨在创建客观数据,可用于将医院和医疗服务提供者与全国平均水平进行比较。研究表明,尽管有良好的患者护理和适当的手术技术,但接受结肠切除术等手术的患者发生手术部位感染(SSI)和其他并发症的发生率较高。因此,在这些质量改进项目中,进行大量结肠和直肠手术病例的医院通常被认定为“高异常值”。像NSQIP这样的项目可能不是衡量结肠和直肠手术等特定亚专业质量的最佳方式。