Quality and Medical Risk Management, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, TU Dresden Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 25;12(7):e058481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058481.
Studies analysing colorectal resections usually focus on a specific outcome (eg, mortality) and/or specific risk factors at the individual (eg, comorbidities) or hospital (eg, volume) level. Comprehensive evidence across different patient safety outcomes, risk factors and patient groups is still scarce. Therefore the aim of this analysis was to investigate consistent relationships between multiple patient safety outcomes, healthcare and hospital risk factors in colorectal resection cases.
Cross-sectional study.
German inpatient routine care data of colorectal resections between 2016 and 2018.
We analysed 54 168 colon resection and 20 395 rectum resection cases treated in German hospitals. The German Inpatient Quality Indicators were used to define colon resections and rectum resections transparently.
Additionally to in-hospital death, postoperative respiratory failure, renal failure and postoperative wound infections we included multiple patient safety outcomes as primary outcomes/dependent variables for our analysis. Healthcare (eg, weekend surgery), hospital (eg, volume) and case (eg, age) characteristics served as independent covariates in a multilevel logistic regression model. The estimated regression coefficients were transferred into ORs.
Weekend surgery, emergency admissions and transfers from other hospitals were significantly associated (ORs ranged from 1.1 to 2.6) with poor patient safety outcome (ie, death, renal failure, postoperative respiratory failure) in colon resections and rectum resections. Hospital characteristics showed heterogeneous effects. In colon resections hospital volume was associated with insignificant or adverse associations (postoperative wound infections: OR 1.168 (95% CI 1.030 to 1.325)) to multiple patient safety outcomes. In rectum resections hospital volume was protectively associated with death, renal failure and postoperative respiratory failure (ORs ranged from 0.7 to 0.8).
Transfer from other hospital and emergency admission are constantly associated with poor patient safety outcome. Hospital variables like volume, ownership or localisation did not show consistent relationships to patient safety outcomes.
ISRCTN10188560.
分析结直肠切除术的研究通常侧重于特定的结局(如死亡率)和/或个体(如合并症)或医院(如手术量)层面的特定风险因素。不同患者安全结局、风险因素和患者群体的综合证据仍然很少。因此,本分析的目的是调查结直肠切除术病例中多种患者安全结局、医疗保健和医院风险因素之间的一致关系。
横断面研究。
2016 年至 2018 年德国住院常规护理数据中的结直肠切除术。
我们分析了 54168 例结肠切除术和 20395 例直肠切除术,这些手术在德国医院进行。德国住院患者质量指标用于透明地定义结肠切除术和直肠切除术。
除住院期间死亡、术后呼吸衰竭、肾衰竭和术后伤口感染外,我们还将多种患者安全结局作为主要结局/因变量纳入分析。医疗保健(如周末手术)、医院(如手术量)和病例(如年龄)特征作为多水平逻辑回归模型中的独立协变量。估计的回归系数被转换为 OR。
周末手术、紧急入院和从其他医院转院与结直肠切除术和直肠切除术不良患者安全结局(即死亡、肾衰竭、术后呼吸衰竭)显著相关(OR 范围为 1.1 至 2.6)。医院特征表现出异质性影响。在结肠切除术方面,医院手术量与多个患者安全结局呈无显著关联或不利关联(术后伤口感染:OR 1.168(95%CI 1.030 至 1.325))。在直肠切除术方面,医院手术量与死亡、肾衰竭和术后呼吸衰竭呈保护相关(OR 范围为 0.7 至 0.8)。
从其他医院转院和紧急入院与不良患者安全结局始终相关。医院变量(如手术量、所有权或位置)与患者安全结局之间没有一致的关系。
ISRCTN8560。