Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):638-44. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827886db.
Anastomotic leaks are one of the most important clinical outcomes after colorectal anastomosis. Because of the lack of measurement of this outcome in databases, research has been limited by the need to perform chart review.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of 2 sources, an administrative database and a clinical registry, to identify anastomotic leaks.
A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing colorectal procedures at an academic medical center over a 1-year period was performed.
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes were used to identify patients, and chart review of all patient records was performed. Risk factors for anastomotic leak were recorded along with the presence or absence of anastomotic leak.
Patients were identified as having a leak in the University HealthSystem Consortium (administrative database) by procedure codes and in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (clinical registry) if they had a postoperative organ space surgical site infection. The administrative and clinical data sources were compared with the use of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for anatomotic leak.
We identified 424 patients; 66 that did not have an anastomosis and 6 that lacked outpatient follow-up were excluded. Anastomotic leak was identified by chart review in 24 patients (6.8%). The clinical registry had the highest specificity (97%) and sensitivity (8%).
Because of the lack of a definition for anastomotic leak in either the administrative database or clinical registry, logical proxies were used.
Although the clinical registry had higher sensitivity and specificity for anastomotic leak, both databases had low sensitivity. Future research on anastomotic leaks would benefit greatly from a uniform definition and recording of this outcome in national databases.
吻合口漏是结直肠吻合术后最重要的临床结果之一。由于数据库中缺乏对此结果的测量,研究受到了进行图表回顾的限制。
本研究旨在评估 2 个来源(一个行政数据库和一个临床注册中心)识别吻合口漏的能力。
对一家学术医疗中心进行的为期 1 年的结直肠手术患者进行回顾性队列研究。
使用国际疾病分类第 9 版临床修正手术代码来识别患者,并对所有患者记录进行图表回顾。记录了吻合口漏的危险因素以及吻合口漏的存在与否。
如果患者的术后器官间隙手术部位感染符合美国联合委员会质量改进计划(临床注册中心)中的定义,则通过手术代码在联合委员会数据库(行政数据库)中被确定为发生吻合口漏;如果患者符合全国外科质量改进计划(临床注册中心)中的定义,则通过手术代码在全国外科质量改进计划(临床注册中心)中被确定为发生吻合口漏。使用吻合口漏的灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值比较行政和临床数据源。
共纳入 424 例患者,排除了 66 例未进行吻合术和 6 例缺乏门诊随访的患者。通过图表回顾在 24 例患者(6.8%)中确定了吻合口漏。临床注册中心的特异性(97%)和敏感性(8%)最高。
由于行政数据库或临床注册中心均未对吻合口漏进行定义,因此使用了逻辑替代指标。
虽然临床注册中心对吻合口漏具有更高的敏感性和特异性,但这两个数据库的敏感性都较低。未来对吻合口漏的研究将从国家数据库中对该结果的统一定义和记录中受益匪浅。