Suppr超能文献

管理人员对州监狱系统临终关怀实践变革的看法。

Administrators' perspectives on changing practice in end-of-life care in a state prison system.

机构信息

School of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Public Health Nurs. 2014 Mar-Apr;31(2):99-108. doi: 10.1111/phn.12069. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sentencing trends have created a demographic shift in prison populations. Greater numbers of inmates are aging and dying in prison, creating a demand for enhanced end-of-life (EOL) care. Changing practice to meet escalating care demands in correction settings is complicated by economic constraints, attitudinal barriers, and organizational features. This study explored perspectives of EOL care held by administrators in a state prison system to reveal challenges to changing practice to meet the needs of inmates suffering advanced illness and dying in prison.

DESIGN AND SAMPLE

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 12 administrators from the central office of a state department of corrections.

MEASURES

Semi-structured discussion guide.

RESULTS

Key influences impacting EOL care services included: local prison culture, treatment versus security focus, case-by-case consideration, public sentiment, budget neutral approaches, and conflicting views of service targets.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings revealed the organizational structures, attitudes, and beliefs held by the administrative echelon of a state prison system and were used to guide the derivation of discrete approaches to changing practice in this complex system. Contextual evaluation permitted a much deeper understanding of the influences on changing practice in this hierarchical bureaucracy. This type of preliminary evaluation is crucial to infusing new practice initiatives in complex organizations caring for stigmatized, at-risk populations.

摘要

目的

量刑趋势导致监狱人口出现了人口结构变化。越来越多的囚犯在狱中衰老和死亡,这对临终关怀提出了更高的要求。在监管环境中改变实践以满足不断升级的护理需求受到经济限制、态度障碍和组织特征的影响。本研究探讨了州监狱系统管理人员对临终关怀的看法,以揭示在囚犯患有晚期疾病和在狱中死亡的情况下,改变实践以满足其需求所面临的挑战。

设计和样本

对州惩教部总部的 12 名管理人员进行了定性访谈。

措施

半结构化讨论指南。

结果

影响临终关怀服务的主要因素包括:当地监狱文化、治疗与安全重点、个案考虑、公众意见、预算中性方法以及服务目标的冲突观点。

结论

这些发现揭示了州监狱系统行政管理层所持有的组织结构、态度和信念,并被用来指导在这个复杂系统中改变实践的具体方法的推导。情境评估允许对这个层级式官僚机构中改变实践的影响有更深入的理解。这种初步评估对于向关心受污名化和处于危险中的人群的复杂组织中注入新的实践举措至关重要。

相似文献

1
Administrators' perspectives on changing practice in end-of-life care in a state prison system.
Public Health Nurs. 2014 Mar-Apr;31(2):99-108. doi: 10.1111/phn.12069. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
2
Palliative and end-of-life care in prisons: a content analysis of the literature.
Int J Prison Health. 2014;10(3):172-97. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-05-2013-0024.
3
End of Life in High-Security Prisons in Switzerland.
J Correct Health Care. 2017 Jan;23(1):32-42. doi: 10.1177/1078345816684782.
4
The Collision of Inmate and Patient.
J Correct Health Care. 2017 Jan;23(1):66-75. doi: 10.1177/1078345816685084.
5
Educating prison staff in the principles of end-of-life care.
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2012 Aug;18(8):391-5. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.8.391.
6
Empowering Change Agents in Hierarchical Organizations: Participatory Action Research in Prisons.
Res Nurs Health. 2016 Jun;39(3):142-53. doi: 10.1002/nur.21716. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
7
CE: Original Research: End-of-Life Care Behind Bars: A Systematic Review.
Am J Nurs. 2016 Mar;116(3):24-36; quiz 37. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000481277.99686.82.
8
A Survey of State Correctional Health Care Providers on Advance Care Planning: Opportunity for Collaboration With Corrections.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Sep;41(9):1051-1057. doi: 10.1177/10499091241226638. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
9
Detained and Dying: Ethical Issues Surrounding End-of-Life Care in Prison.
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2016 Jul-Sep;12(3):259-76. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2016.1200517.
10
Palliative Care in UK Prisons.
J Correct Health Care. 2017 Jan;23(1):56-65. doi: 10.1177/1078345816684847.

引用本文的文献

2
Dying for a change: a systematic review of compassionate release policies.
Int J Prison Health. 2023 Mar 16;19(1):47-62. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-11-2021-0110. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
Large-scale evaluation of a computer-based learning program to increase prison staff knowledge on geriatric and end-of-life care.
Int J Prison Health. 2022 Jun 2;18(2):185-199. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-08-2021-0078. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
4
A Toolkit for Enhancing End-of-Life Care: An Examination of Implementation and Impact.
Prison J. 2018 Jan;98(1):104-118. doi: 10.1177/0032885517743933. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
5
Inmates Care: Computer-Based Training for Geriatric and End-of-Life Care in Prisons.
J Correct Health Care. 2021 Jun;27(2):132-144. doi: 10.1089/jchc.20.03.0016. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
6
Barriers to and Strategies for Gaining Entry to Correctional Settings for Health Research.
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2020 Mar;33(1):71-80. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2020.26190.
7
8
Enhancing Care of Aged and Dying Prisoners: Is e-Learning a Feasible Approach?
J Forensic Nurs. 2017 Oct/Dec;13(4):178-185. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000168.
9
Empowering Change Agents in Hierarchical Organizations: Participatory Action Research in Prisons.
Res Nurs Health. 2016 Jun;39(3):142-53. doi: 10.1002/nur.21716. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
10
Essential Elements of an Effective Prison Hospice Program.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 May;33(4):390-402. doi: 10.1177/1049909115574491. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges and strategies for research in prisons.
Public Health Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;29(5):467-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2012.01027.x. Epub 2012 May 25.
2
Patient safety: moving the bar in prison health care standards.
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2103-10. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184242. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
3
Aging prisoners stressing health care system.
JAMA. 2004 Jul 28;292(4):423-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.4.423.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验