Kunnari Sari, Savinainen-Makkonen Tuula, Leonard Laurence B, Mäkinen Leena, Tolonen Anna-Kaisa
Faculty of Humanities, Child Language Research Center, University of Oulu , Oulu , Finland and.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Sep;28(9):697-708. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.886725. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
Children with specific language impairment (SLI) have difficulty expressing subject-verb agreement. However, in many languages, tense is fused with agreement, making it difficult to attribute the problem to agreement in particular. In Finnish, negative markers are function words that agree with the subject in person and number but do not express tense, providing an opportunity to assess the status of agreement in a more straightforward way. Fifteen Finnish-speaking preschoolers with SLI, 15 age controls and 15 younger controls responded to items requiring negative markers in first person singular and plural, and third person singular and plural. The children with SLI were less accurate than both typically developing groups. However, their problems were limited to particular person-number combinations. Furthermore, the children with SLI appeared to have difficulty selecting the form of the lexical verb that should accompany the negative marker, suggesting that agreement was not the sole difficulty.
患有特定语言障碍(SLI)的儿童在表达主谓一致方面存在困难。然而,在许多语言中,时态与一致性融合在一起,这使得很难将问题特别归因于一致性。在芬兰语中,否定标记是功能词,它们在人称和数上与主语一致,但不表达时态,这为以更直接的方式评估一致性状态提供了机会。15名讲芬兰语的患有SLI的学龄前儿童、15名年龄匹配的对照组儿童和15名年龄更小的对照组儿童对需要第一人称单数和复数以及第三人称单数和复数的否定标记的项目做出反应。患有SLI的儿童比两个发育正常的组的准确性都要低。然而,他们的问题仅限于特定的人称 - 数组合。此外,患有SLI的儿童似乎在选择与否定标记搭配的实义动词形式时存在困难,这表明一致性并不是唯一的困难。