Faculty of Humanities, Logopedics, University of Oulu, Finland.
J Child Lang. 2011 Nov;38(5):999-1027. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000528. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
Children with specific language impairment (SLI) vary widely in their ability to use tense/agreement inflections depending on the type of language being acquired, a fact that current accounts of SLI have tried to explain. Finnish provides an important test case for these accounts because: (1) verbs in the first and second person permit null subjects whereas verbs in the third person do not; and (2) tense and agreement inflections are agglutinating and thus one type of inflection can appear without the other. Probes were used to compare the verb inflection use of Finnish-speaking children with SLI, and both age-matched and younger typically developing children. The children with SLI were less accurate, and the pattern of their errors did not match predictions based on current accounts of SLI. It appears that children with SLI have difficulty learning complex verb inflection paradigms apart from any problem specific to tense and agreement.
患有特定语言障碍 (SLI) 的儿童在使用时态/一致性屈折变化方面的能力差异很大,这是当前 SLI 解释所试图解释的事实。芬兰语为这些解释提供了一个重要的测试案例,因为:(1) 第一人称和第二人称动词允许主语省略,而第三人称动词则不允许;(2) 时态和一致性屈折是黏着的,因此一种类型的屈折可以出现而另一种则不出现。探针被用来比较芬兰语 SLI 儿童以及年龄匹配和年龄较小的典型发育儿童的动词屈折使用情况。患有 SLI 的儿童准确性较低,并且他们的错误模式与基于当前 SLI 解释的预测不符。看来,患有 SLI 的儿童在学习复杂的动词屈折范式方面存在困难,而不仅仅是时态和一致性方面的特定问题。