• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种用于上颌第三磨牙手术拔除的麻醉方法比较：腭大孔神经阻滞技术与局部浸润技术。

A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique.

作者信息

Al-Delayme Ra Ed Ma

机构信息

B.D.S, S.OMFS.S, C.A.B.OMFS, M.F.D. R.C.S. I., M.O.M.S. R.C.P.S .G, F.F.D (OSOM) R.C.S.I. Dean of The Faculty of Dentistry, Dijla University College, Baghdad, Iraq ; B.D.S, S.OMFS.S, C.A.B.OMFS, M.F.D. R.C.S. I., M.O.M.S. R.C.P.S .G, F.F.D (OSOM) R.C.S. I. Senior Specialist at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dept., AL-Yarmuk Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Feb 1;6(1):e12-6. doi: 10.4317/jced.51199. eCollection 2014 Feb.

DOI:10.4317/jced.51199
PMID:24596629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3935899/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of PSA block injection with infiltration technique regarding local anesthesia for surgical extraction of upper third molar.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective, intra individual, single-blind randomized controlled trial was designed to study the severity of pain during injection and after surgical extraction of the bilaterally and symmetrically similar upper third molar in a total of 53 patients, in addition to evaluating the need to repeat the injection and requirement of post operative anti-inflammatory tablets.

RESULT

Although the average pain score for all studied times in PSA side was lower than the average pain score in infiltration technique, repeated statistical measures demonstrated that no significant pain reduction occurred in the two techniques.

CONCLUSION

The both tested methods have the same statistic equivalence for the surgical extraction of maxillary third molars. Key words:Surgical extraction, maxillary third molars, PSA block, infiltration.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较腭大孔阻滞注射与浸润技术在上颌第三磨牙手术拔除局部麻醉中的效果。

材料与方法

设计一项前瞻性、个体内、单盲随机对照试验，研究53例患者双侧对称相似上颌第三磨牙注射时及手术拔除后的疼痛程度，此外还评估重复注射的必要性及术后抗炎药片的需求。

结果

尽管腭大孔侧所有研究时间的平均疼痛评分低于浸润技术的平均疼痛评分，但重复统计测量表明两种技术均未出现显著的疼痛减轻。

结论

两种测试方法在上颌第三磨牙手术拔除中具有相同的统计学等效性。关键词：手术拔除；上颌第三磨牙；腭大孔阻滞；浸润

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/3935899/e990452b123b/jced-6-e12-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/3935899/f4fd74791e5b/jced-6-e12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/3935899/036481350691/jced-6-e12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/3935899/5e11730cc70c/jced-6-e12-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/3935899/e990452b123b/jced-6-e12-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/3935899/f4fd74791e5b/jced-6-e12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/3935899/036481350691/jced-6-e12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/3935899/5e11730cc70c/jced-6-e12-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdfd/3935899/e990452b123b/jced-6-e12-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of two anesthesia methods for the surgical removal of maxillary third molars: PSA nerve block technique vs. local infiltration technique.两种用于上颌第三磨牙手术拔除的麻醉方法比较：腭大孔神经阻滞技术与局部浸润技术。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Feb 1;6(1):e12-6. doi: 10.4317/jced.51199. eCollection 2014 Feb.
2
PSA block for maxillary molar's anesthesia - an obsolete technique?用于上颌磨牙麻醉的PSA阻滞——一种过时的技术？
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):e39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.046. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
3
The Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and PSA Injection of 2% Lidocaine on Anesthesia of Maxillary Second Molars.4%阿替卡因颊部浸润与2%利多卡因翼腭管注射对上颌第二磨牙的麻醉效果
Iran Endod J. 2017 Summer;12(3):276-281. doi: 10.22037/iej.v12i3.16464.
4
Posterior superior alveolar nerve block alone in the extraction of upper third molars: a prospective clinical study.单独使用上牙槽后神经阻滞麻醉在上颌第三磨牙拔除术中的应用：一项前瞻性临床研究
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Aug;23(4):213-220. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.4.213. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
5
Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block and inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal or lingual infiltration using articaine in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a preliminary prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial.评价用阿替卡因行下齿槽神经阻滞及颊（舌）侧浸润麻醉在下颌磨牙牙髓不可逆性炎症中麻醉效果的前瞻性随机单盲临床研究。
Quintessence Int. 2021 Sep 9;52(9):820-826. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b1864321.
6
The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial.阿替卡因和利多卡因单次颊侧浸润与利多卡因常规颊侧和腭侧注射在上颌乳磨牙拔除术中的有效性：一项随机对照试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):160-164. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186589.
7
A blinded randomized controlled trial comparing lignocaine and placebo administration to the palate for removal of maxillary third molars.一项比较利多卡因和安慰剂用于腭部以拔除上颌第三磨牙的双盲随机对照试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Dec;36(12):1177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
8
A prospective randomized double-blind study to assess the latency and efficacy of twin-mix and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a pilot study.一项前瞻性随机双盲研究，旨在评估双混剂与含1:200,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因在外科拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙中的潜伏期和疗效：一项初步研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;17(4):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0372-3. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
9
Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia.下颌前磨牙和磨牙的拔除：经压力注射器局部浸润麻醉与下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1523-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2251-7. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
10
Peripheral morphine reduces acute pain in inflamed tissue after third molar extraction: A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial.外周吗啡可减轻第三磨牙拔除术后炎症组织的急性疼痛：一项双盲、随机、活性对照临床试验。
Scand J Pain. 2016 Apr;11:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Anesthetic Efficacy of Endo-Ice and Intrapulpal Ice Sticks After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Controlled Study.下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉后使用Endo-Ice和牙髓内冰棒对症状性不可逆性牙髓炎的麻醉效果：一项随机对照研究
Cureus. 2023 Jul 19;15(7):e42135. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42135. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Comparison of the Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Infiltration Injection for Postendodontic Pain in Patients with Necrotic Pulp: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.地塞米松与甲泼尼龙在坏死牙髓患者根管治疗后疼痛浸润注射中疗效的比较：一项随机对照临床试验。
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Feb 23;2022:4163120. doi: 10.1155/2022/4163120. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Temporary pupillary dilatation and ptosis: complications of PSA nerve block: a case report and review of literature.暂时性瞳孔散大和上睑下垂：PSA神经阻滞的并发症：一例报告及文献复习
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009 Jun;8(2):181-3. doi: 10.1007/s12663-009-0044-5. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
2
A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of posterior superior alveolar nerve blocks, buccal infiltrations, and buccal plus palatal infiltrations in patients with irreversible pulpitis.一项关于在不可复性牙髓炎患者中应用上牙槽后神经阻滞麻醉、颊侧局部浸润麻醉和颊侧浸润加腭侧浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、单盲对照评估。
J Endod. 2011 Nov;37(11):1491-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.018.
3
Effect of Intrapapillary Local Anesthetic on Postoperative Pain Following Dental Treatment Under General Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients.
局部麻醉药在小儿全麻下口腔治疗术后的镇痛效果。
Anesth Prog. 2021 Dec 1;68(4):206-213. doi: 10.2344/anpr-68-02-06.
4
Comparing the Efficiencies of Third Molar Surgeries With and Without a Dentist Anesthesiologist.比较有和没有牙医麻醉师参与的第三磨牙手术的效率。
Anesth Prog. 2017 Spring;64(1):8-16. doi: 10.2344/anpr-63-03-11.
PSA block for maxillary molar's anesthesia - an obsolete technique?
用于上颌磨牙麻醉的PSA阻滞——一种过时的技术？
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):e39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.046. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
4
Anesthetic efficacy of a combination palatal and buccal infiltration of the maxillary first molar.上颌第一磨牙腭颊侧局部浸润麻醉效果。
J Endod. 2011 Apr;37(4):460-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
5
Aspirations and solutions--a 20 year journey through dental local anaesthetics.愿望与解决方案——局部麻醉剂在口腔医学领域的 20 年探索之旅。
Surgeon. 2009 Dec;7(6):358-61. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(09)80110-8.
6
A method for extraction of impacted upper third molars.一种上颌第三磨牙阻生牙的拔除方法。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;49(2):150-1. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.04.014. Epub 2010 May 21.
7
Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 milliliters and 3.6 milliliters of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for posterior superior alveolar nerve blocks.1.8 毫升和 3.6 毫升含 1:100000 肾上腺素的 2%利多卡因用于上颌后神经阻滞的麻醉效果。
J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):598-601. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.01.009.
8
Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.4%阿替卡因与2%利多卡因对上颌不可逆性牙髓炎患者进行颊侧浸润麻醉的效果比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jan;107(1):133-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.002.
9
Anesthetic efficacy of 3 volumes of lidocaine with epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia.3 毫升含肾上腺素利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的麻醉效果
Anesth Prog. 2008 Summer;55(2):29-34. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[29:AEOVOL]2.0.CO;2.
10
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.阿替卡因与利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、双盲对照研究。
J Endod. 2008 Apr;34(4):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Feb 7.