Zwirewich C V, Müller N L, Lam S C
Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Canada.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Nov;151(5):897-901. doi: 10.2214/ajr.151.5.897.
Photodynamic laser therapy is used in the palliation of advanced lung cancer. To minimize the complications of this form of therapy, physicians must evaluate correctly the extent of extraluminal disease. We undertook a study to compare CT and bronchoscopy in the evaluation of extent of disease before laser therapy in 20 patients with complete bronchial obstruction. The relative contribution of intraluminal and extraluminal tumor to the obstruction and its influence on response to therapy was assessed by using both techniques. Adequate response was defined as greater than or equal to 50% relief of the obstruction on bronchoscopy performed within 1 week of therapy and by any improvement of the postobstructive atelectasis and consolidation on follow-up chest radiographs. Nine patients had predominately intraluminal tumor on both CT and bronchoscopy before laser therapy. Eight of these had a bronchoscopic response and radiographic improvement after therapy. Ten patients had predominately extrinsic compression by tumor on CT. Of these, only two had a bronchoscopic response and none had radiographic improvement after treatment. The differences in bronchoscopic and radiographic response between the two groups were significant (p less than .01). In the 10 patients with predominately extraluminal tumor on CT, bronchoscopy agreed with CT in suggesting mainly extrinsic compression in five, but it incorrectly suggested mainly intraluminal tumor in the remaining five. In one patient with a left upper-lobe tumor, the relative intra- and extraluminal components could not be assessed on CT. We conclude that in complete bronchial obstruction, CT is superior to bronchoscopy in evaluating the extent of extrinsic compression by tumor. The presence of predominately extraluminal tumor compression on CT correlates with a poor response to laser therapy.
光动力激光疗法用于晚期肺癌的姑息治疗。为了尽量减少这种治疗方式的并发症,医生必须正确评估管腔外病变的范围。我们进行了一项研究,比较CT和支气管镜检查在评估20例完全性支气管阻塞患者激光治疗前病变范围方面的作用。通过这两种技术评估管腔内和管腔外肿瘤对阻塞的相对作用及其对治疗反应的影响。充分反应的定义为:治疗后1周内进行的支气管镜检查显示阻塞缓解大于或等于50%,以及随访胸部X线片显示阻塞后肺不张和实变有任何改善。9例患者在激光治疗前CT和支气管镜检查均显示主要为管腔内肿瘤。其中8例治疗后支气管镜检查有反应且X线片有改善。10例患者CT显示主要为肿瘤外压。其中只有2例支气管镜检查有反应,治疗后均无X线片改善。两组支气管镜检查和X线片反应的差异有显著性(p<0.01)。在CT显示主要为管腔外肿瘤的10例患者中,支气管镜检查与CT一致,提示5例主要为外压,但其余5例错误地提示主要为管腔内肿瘤。1例左上叶肿瘤患者,CT无法评估管腔内和管腔外成分的相对比例。我们得出结论,在完全性支气管阻塞中,CT在评估肿瘤外压范围方面优于支气管镜检查。CT显示主要为管腔外肿瘤压迫与激光治疗反应差相关。