• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在目标导向的伸手动作过程中,空间注意力的分布会随着任务需求而变化。

The distribution of spatial attention changes with task demands during goal-directed reaching.

作者信息

Long Heidi, Ma-Wyatt Anna

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia,

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jun;232(6):1883-93. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3880-6. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-014-3880-6
PMID:24599490
Abstract

Goal-directed movements are commonly used to allow humans to interact with their environment. When making a goal-directed movement in a natural environment, there are many competing stimuli. It is therefore important to understand how making a goal-directed movement could be impacted by the need to divide attention between the movement and competing stimuli. We used a dual-task paradigm to investigate the sharing of attentional resources between a search task in central vision and a peripheral pointing task completed concurrently. Results suggest some degree of shared attentional resources between these two tasks with performance on both central and peripheral tasks degraded under dual-task conditions. Movement latency, but not movement time, was also affected by dual-task conditions. Altogether, the results suggest that there is a cost to reach performance if attention is engaged away from the movement goal. Interestingly, this cost is associated with movement planning rather than execution.

摘要

目标导向运动通常用于让人类与环境进行交互。在自然环境中进行目标导向运动时,存在许多相互竞争的刺激因素。因此,了解在运动和竞争刺激之间分配注意力的需求如何影响目标导向运动非常重要。我们使用了一种双任务范式来研究中央视觉搜索任务和同时完成的外周指向任务之间注意力资源的分配。结果表明,这两个任务之间存在一定程度的共享注意力资源,在双任务条件下,中央和外周任务的表现都会下降。双任务条件还会影响运动潜伏期,但不影响运动时间。总之,结果表明,如果注意力从运动目标上转移,达到最佳表现是有代价的。有趣的是,这种代价与运动规划而非执行有关。

相似文献

1
The distribution of spatial attention changes with task demands during goal-directed reaching.在目标导向的伸手动作过程中,空间注意力的分布会随着任务需求而变化。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jun;232(6):1883-93. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3880-6. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
2
Preparing coordinated eye and hand movements: dual-task costs are not attentional.准备协调的眼手运动:双重任务成本并非注意力方面的。
J Vis. 2010 Dec 20;10(14):23. doi: 10.1167/10.14.23.
3
Attention and suppression affect tactile perception in reach-to-grasp movements.注意力和抑制作用会影响抓握动作中的触觉感知。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Oct;138(2):302-10. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
4
The spatial and temporal properties of attentional selectivity for saccades and reaches.扫视和伸手动作的注意力选择性的时空特性。
J Vis. 2019 Aug 1;19(9):12. doi: 10.1167/19.9.12.
5
Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements.双手运动准备过程中的视觉注意力。
Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(4):549-63. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.023.
6
Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness.早期失聪后视觉注意力空间分布的变化。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Jul 1;14(5):687-701. doi: 10.1162/08989290260138591.
7
Goal-directed reaching: the SNARC effect influences movement planning but not movement execution.目标导向的伸手动作:空间数字反应编码联合效应影响动作规划而非动作执行。
Seeing Perceiving. 2011;24(3):223-40. doi: 10.1163/187847511X576794.
8
Attentional selection of multiple goal positions before rapid hand movement sequences: an event-related potential study.快速手部运动序列之前多个目标位置的注意选择:一项事件相关电位研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jan;21(1):18-29. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21021.
9
Planning Movements in Visual and Physical Space in Monkey Posterior Parietal Cortex.猴子后顶叶皮层中视觉和物理空间内的运动规划
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Feb;26(2):731-47. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu312. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
10
Is automatic imitation based on goal coding or movement coding? A comparison of goal-directed and goal-less actions.自动模仿是基于目标编码还是动作编码?目标导向动作与无目标动作的比较。
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(3):213-25. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000190.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the ability to track multiple moving targets as a function of postural stability: a comparison between team sports players and sedentary individuals.考察作为姿势稳定性函数的跟踪多个移动目标的能力:团队运动参与者与久坐个体之间的比较。
PeerJ. 2022 Sep 2;10:e13964. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13964. eCollection 2022.
2
Do left hand reaction time advantages depend on localising unpredictable targets?左手反应时间优势是否取决于对不可预测目标的定位?
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Dec;234(12):3625-3632. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4758-6. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: the attentional boost effect in implicit memory.分散注意力可以增强记忆编码:内隐记忆中的注意力促进效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jul;39(4):1223-31. doi: 10.1037/a0030907. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
2
Attention is needed for action control: further evidence from grasping.动作控制需要注意力:抓握动作的进一步证据
Vision Res. 2012 Oct 15;71:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
3
The Premotor theory of attention: time to move on?注意的前运动理论:是时候继续前进了?
Neuropsychologia. 2012 May;50(6):1104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.025. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
4
Attentional window set by expected relevance of environmental signals.注意窗口由环境信号的预期相关性设定。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021262. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
5
Locus of spatial attention determines inward-outward anisotropy in crowding.空间注意力的位点决定了拥挤现象中的由内向外各向异性。
J Vis. 2011 Apr 1;11(4):1. doi: 10.1167/11.4.1.
6
Preparing coordinated eye and hand movements: dual-task costs are not attentional.准备协调的眼手运动:双重任务成本并非注意力方面的。
J Vis. 2010 Dec 20;10(14):23. doi: 10.1167/10.14.23.
7
Attentional limits and freedom in visually guided action.视觉引导行为中的注意力限制与自由度
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:215-26. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17612-4.
8
Parietal damage dissociates saccade planning from presaccadic perceptual facilitation.顶叶损伤使扫视计划与扫视前的知觉促进相分离。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Feb;19(2):383-7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn088. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
9
Visual attention is a single, integrated resource.视觉注意力是一种单一的、整合的资源。
Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.04.011. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
10
Proprioceptive deafferentation slows down the processing of visual hand feedback.本体感觉传入神经阻滞会减缓视觉手部反馈的处理。
J Vis. 2007 Sep 28;7(5):12.1-7. doi: 10.1167/7.5.12.